...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Is it really time to go back to school?
【24h】

Is it really time to go back to school?

机译:是时候回到学校了吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

No doubt Munro and Faust intended to be provocative,1 but there is an unfortunate non-sequitur in the title of their Viewpoint paper: based on limited evidence, the authors suggest that since children may not be super-spreaders for COVID-19, it is safe to reopen schools. While acknowledging a lack of high-quality sero-surveillance data, the paper then reiterates: “Governments worldwide should allow all children back to school”. If only it were that simple. In fact, the question should not be ‘are children super-spreaders?’ but ‘what effect will re-opening schools to all pupils have on the local community in terms of spread of coronavirus?’.
机译:毫无疑问,穆罗和浮士电旨在挑衅,1但是在他们的观点论文的标题中有一个不幸的非拼票:基于有限的证据,提交人认为,由于儿童可能不是Covid-19的超级展示者,因此 可以安全地重新开放学校。 虽然承认缺乏高质量的血清监测数据,那篇论文然后重申:“世界各国政府应该让所有孩子回到学校”。 像那么简单就好了。 事实上,问题不应该'是儿童超级展示者吗?“但”在冠状病毒的传播方面,在当地社区的所有学生都会重新开设学校的效果是什么?“。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号