首页> 外文期刊>Acta bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis >Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy
【24h】

Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy

机译:用核桃商业提取物和刺刺刺的刺刺刺刺激与核桃过敏的开放食物挑战相比

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and aim: Diagnosis of walnut allergy includes the evaluation of IgE sensitization by skin prick tests (SPT) with standardized commercial extracts. When assuming the loss of relevant allergens due to extract preparation and storage, it is possible to perform SPT with fresh foods, i.e., prick by prick (PbP). To our knowledge, there is no published comparison between SPT with commercial extracts and PbP with fresh food about their sensitivity to the diagnosis of walnut allergy. Therefore, we describe our experience. Methods: We observed seven children (mean age SD 6.8 years 5.2, range 2 - 15 years; male 85%) with an history of immediate adverse reaction following walnut ingestion. All but one the patients underwent SPT with at least two out of three walnut commercial extracts (Lofarma, Milan, Italy; ALK-Abellò, Milan, Italy; Allergopharma, Rome, Italy). It has also been performed PbP with raw walnut. IgE-mediated walnut allergy was diagnosed based on suggestive history, positivity of PbP and failed open food challenge with walnut. Results: The SPT with Lofarma extract was never positive (sensitivity = 0%), that performed with ALK extract was positive in 2/5 cases (sensitivity 40%) and that of Allergopharma extract was positive in 1/5 cases (sensitivity 20%). PbP was positive in 7/7 cases (sensitivity 100%). Conclusions: In the specific case of walnut allergy in pediatric age, the execution of SPT alone with commercial extract may not be sufficient and clarifying in the diagnostic iter. We suggest to always associate the execution of PbP test.
机译:背景和目的:核桃过敏的诊断包括用标准化的商业提取物进行皮肤刺刺(SPT)对IgE致敏评估。当假设由于提取制备和储存而导致的相关过敏原的损失时,可以使用新鲜食品进行SPT,即通过刺(PBP)刺。为了我们的知识,SPT与商业提取物和PBP与新鲜食品之间的敏感性对核桃过敏诊断的敏感性,没有公开比较。因此,我们描述了我们的经验。方法:我们观察了七个儿童(平均年龄SD 6.8岁5.2,范围为2 - 15岁;男性85%),核桃摄入后立即不良反应历史。除了三个核桃商业提取物中至少有两个患者(米兰,意大利洛菲玛,米兰,意大利的Alk-abellò;意大利,米兰,意大利的患者,除了一个患者它也已经用生核桃进行了PBP。 IgE介导的核桃过敏是根据暗示历史,PBP的阳性诊断出来的,并用核桃开放的食物挑战失败。结果:与洛伐蛋草提取物的SPT从未呈阳性(敏感性= 0%),用Alk提取物进行的2/5例(敏感性40%)阳性,并且艾伦戈科提取物的1/5例阳性(敏感性20%) )。 PBP在7/7例中呈阳性(敏感度100%)。结论:在儿科年龄核桃过敏的具体情况下,单独使用商业提取物的SPT的执行可能在诊断镜头中可能没有充分和澄清。我们建议始终与PBP测试的执行相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号