首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Psychometric validation techniques applied to the IND-VFQ-33 visual function questionnaire: the Hyderabad ocular morbidity in the elderly study (HOMES)
【24h】

Psychometric validation techniques applied to the IND-VFQ-33 visual function questionnaire: the Hyderabad ocular morbidity in the elderly study (HOMES)

机译:对Id-VFQ-33视觉功能问卷的心理测量验证技术:老年学习中的海德拉巴耐眼病(家园)

获取原文
           

摘要

Over 2 billion people suffer from vision impairment or blindness globally, and access to validated visual measurement tools in imperative in accurately describing and managing the burden of eye disease. The present study applies contemporary psychometric validation techniques to the widely used 33-item Indian Visual Function Questionnaire (IND-VFQ-33). We first estimated the polychoric correlation between each pair of items. Next, an unrotated and oblique Promax rotated factor analysis, item response theory (IRT, using a graded response model (GRM)), and differential item functioning (DIF) testing were applied to the IND-VFQ-33. We subsequently propose a validated IND-VFQ-33 questionnaire after psychometric testing, data reduction, and adjustment. Exploratory unrotated factor analysis identified two factors; one with a particularly high eigenvalue (18.1) and a second with a lower eigenvalue still above our threshold (1.1). A subsequent oblique Promax factor rotation was undertaken for a 2-factor solution, revealing two moderately correlated factors ( ?0.68) with clinically discrete item loadings onto either Factor 1 (21 items; collectively labelled “daily activities”) or Factor 2 (5 items; collectively labelled “bright lights”). IRT confirmed high item discrimination for all remaining items with good separation between difficulty thresholds. We found significant DIF on depression for six items in Factor 1 (all uniform DIF, except item 21 (non-uniform DIF) with no substantive difference in beta thresholds for any item and no substantive difference in expected individual or sum score, by depression at baseline. For Factor 2, only one item demonstrated significant uniform DIF on gender, similarly without major differences in beta thresholds or expected total score between gender at baseline. Consequently, no further item recalibration or reduction was undertaken after IRT and DIF analysis. Applying IRT and DIF validation techniques to the IND-VFQ-33 identified 2 discrete factors with 26 uniquely-loading items, clinically representative of difficulty performing daily activities and experiencing difficulty due to bright lights/glare respectively. The proposed modified scale may be useful in evaluating symptomatic disease progression or response to treatment in an Indian population.
机译:超过20亿人患有视力障碍或全球失明,并在准确地描述和管理眼病负担的必要方面获得验证的视觉测量工具。本研究将当代心理测量验证技术应用于广泛使用的33项印度视觉功能问卷(IND-VFQ-33)。我们首先估计每对物品之间的聚焦相关性。接下来,未解决的和倾斜突出的突出因子分析,项目响应理论(使用分级响应模型(GRM))和差分项目功能(DIF)测试被应用于IND-VFQ-33。我们随后在心理检验测试,数据减少和调整后提出了验证的IND-VFQ-33问卷调查问卷。探索无限因素分析确定了两个因素;一种具有特别高的特征值(18.1)和仍然高于我们阈值(1.1)的下部值的秒。随后的倾斜突出因子旋转进行2因素解决方案,揭示两个中等相关的因子(?0.68),临床上是一个因素1(21项;统称为“日常活动”)或因子2(5项;集体标记为“明亮的灯光”)。 IRT确认了难度阈值之间良好分离的所有剩余物品的高项目歧视。在因子1中的六个项目(所有均匀的DIF,除了项目21(非均匀DIF)中没有实质性差异,对于任何物品而言,抑郁症没有实质性差异,抑郁症,抑郁症,抑郁率没有实质性差异,并且在抑郁基线。对于因素2,只有一个项目在性别上表现出显着的统一差异,同样没有β阈值的重大差异或在基线之间的性别之间的预期总分。因此,在IRT和DIF分析后没有进一步重新校准或减少。应用IRT与Ind-VFQ-33的DIF验证技术确定了2种不同的离散因素,具有26个独特的装载项目,临床上代表难以进行日常活动,并且分别由于明亮的灯光/眩光而遇到困难。所提出的修饰规模可用于评估症状疾病进展或对印度人群治疗的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号