...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?
【24h】

Do cognitive performance and physical function differ between individuals with motoric cognitive risk syndrome and those with mild cognitive impairment?

机译:认知性能和物理功能在具有摩托车认知风险综合征的个人和具有轻度认知障碍的人之间的不同之处不同吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is defined by slow gait speed combined with subjective cognitive complaint. MCR is a predementia syndrome, similar to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, there is currently no study comparing the differences in cognitive performance and physical function between these two types of cognitive impairment. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare cognitive performance and physical function in individuals with MCR versus MCI. A total of 77 participants, free of dementia, were recruited from the neurological outpatient clinic of a medical center in Taiwan. Participants were separated into 2 groups, MCR (n?=?33) and MCI (n?=?44) groups, based on definition criteria from previous studies. The priority was to assign a diagnosis of MCR first, followed by MCI. Hence, “pure” MCI had no overlap with MCR syndrome. Cognitive performance, including executive function, attention, working memory, episode memory, visuospatial function, and language, were measured. Physical functions such as activities in daily living, the Tinetti Assessment Scale, and the Timed Up and Go test were also measured. Executive function, attention, working memory, episodic memory and language were all significantly lower in the MCR group than the MCI group. Abilities related to physical function, including those measured by the Tinetti Assessment Scale and the Timed Up and Go test, were significantly lower in the MCR group than the MCI group. We noted that cognitive performance and physical function were lower in MCR individuals than MCI but without MCR syndrome. However, the conclusions were based on the enrollment procedure of participants prioritizes the MCR syndrome. Because of the overlap of MCR and MCI, future studies should use different enrollment strategies to further clarify the status of these two populations.
机译:电动认知风险综合征(MCR)由缓慢的步态速度与主观认知投诉相结合来定义。 MCR是一种类似于轻度认知障碍(MCI)的探测综合征。但是,目前没有研究这两种认知障碍之间的认知性能和物理功能的差异。因此,本研究的目的是将个体的认知性能和物理功能与MCR相比进行比较。从台湾医疗中心的神经系统门诊诊所招募了77名与会者,没有痴呆症。根据先前研究的定义标准,参与者分为2组MCR(N?= 33)和MCI(n?=?44)组。优先级是首先分配MCR的诊断,其次是MCI。因此,“纯”MCI与MCR综合征没有重叠。测量了认知性能,包括执行功能,注意力,工作记忆,集内存,探索空间功能和语言。还测量了日常生活中活动,Tinetti评估规模和定时和去测试等体力功能。管理功能,注意,工作记忆,情节记忆和语言在MCR组中大于MCI组。与物理功能相关的能力,包括由Tinetti评估规模和定时和试验测量的能力,MCR组在MCR组中显着低于MCI组。我们注意到,MCR个体的认知性能和物理功能比MCI低,但没有MCR综合征。但是,结论是基于参与者的注册程序优先考虑MCR综合征。由于MCR和MCI重叠,未来的研究应该使用不同的入学策略来进一步澄清这两个人群的地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号