首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Delirium in older patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: incidence, predictors, and cognitive prognosis
【24h】

Delirium in older patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: incidence, predictors, and cognitive prognosis

机译:老年患者的谵妄接受主动脉瓣置换:发病率,预测因子和认知预后

获取原文
           

摘要

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is increasingly performed in frail older patients who were previously ineligible for a standard surgical procedure. The objectives of this study are to determine delirium incidence, predictors, and relationship with cognitive performance at 3-month follow-up in older patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). Patients (N?=?93) aged 70?years and older, undergoing transcatheter (TAVR, N?=?66) or surgical (SAVR, N?=?27) aortic valve replacement in an academic medical center were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. Data on patients’ socio-demographics, functional status (including instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and surgical risk scores (including Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score), were collected at baseline. Cognitive status was assessed with the Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) and the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) at baseline and 3?months after AVR. Delirium occurred in 21 (23%) patients, within the first three postoperative days in 95% (20/21) of the cases. Delirium incidence was lower in TAVR (13/66?=?20%) than SAVR (8/27?=?30%) patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (p?=?.298). Patients with delirium had lower baseline cognitive performance (median MMSE score 27.0?±?3.0 vs 28.0?±?3.0, p?=?.029), lower performance in IADL (7.0 vs 8.0, p?=?.038), and higher STS risk scores (4.7?±?2.7 vs 2.9?±?2.3, p?=?.020). In multivariate analyses, patients with intermediate (score??3 to ≤8) and high (score??8) STS risk scores had 4.3 (95%CI 1.2–15.1, p?=?.025) and 16.5 (95%CI 2.0–138.2, p?=?.010), respectively, higher odds of incident delirium compared to patients with low (score?≤?3) STS risk scores. At 3-month follow-up (N?=?77), patients with delirium still had lower MMSE score (27.0?±?8.0 vs 28.0?±?2.0, p?=?.007) but this difference did not remain significant once adjusting for baseline MMSE (β-coefficient 1.11, 95%CI [??3.03–0.80], p?=?.248). Delirium occurred in about one in five older patients undergoing AVR, almost essentially within the first three postoperative days. Beside cognitive performance, STS risk score could enhance the identification of high-risk older patients to better target preventative interventions.
机译:经齿轮管主动脉瓣膜置换越来越多地在以前没有资格获得标准外科手术的患者中进行。本研究的目标是确定谵妄发病率,预测因子和与认知性能的关系,在接受主动脉瓣置换(AVR)的老年患者的3个月随访中。患者(n?= 93)70岁,年龄较大,经过转截管(Tavr,n?= 66)或手术(Savr,n?= 27)学术医疗中心的主动脉瓣在这一前瞻中注册队列研究。使用术后第1,2,3和7.患者社会人口统计数据,功能状况(包括日常生活活动(IADL)和外科风险分数(包括在基线收集胸外科医生(STS)风险评分的社会。通过基线的迷你精神状态考试(MMSE)和时钟绘图测试(CDT)评估认知状态,AVR后的3个月。谵妄发生在21(23%)患者,在95%(20/21)的前三个术后日内的患者.TAVR(13/66?= 20%)少于Savr(8/27?=? 30%)患者,但这种差异没有统计学意义(p?=Δ.298)。谵妄患者的基线认知性能较低(中位数MMSE 27.0?±3.0 Vs 28.0?±3.0,P?= ?. 029),在IADL的性能下降(7.0 VS 8.0,P?= 038),更高的STS风险评分(4.7?±2. 2.7 Vs 2.9?±2.3,P?= 020)。在多变量分析中,患者W. Ith中间体(得分?&Δ3至≤8)和高(得分?&?8)STS风险评分具有4.3(95%CI 1.2-15.1,p?= 025)和16.5(95%CI 2.0 -138.2,p?= 010)分别较低的事件谵妄的几率较高(得分?≤≤3)STS风险评分。在3个月的随访中(n?=?77),谵妄患者仍有较低的MMSE得分(27.0?±8.0 vs 28.0?±?2.0,P?= 007)但这种差异并没有保持重要一旦调整基线MMSE(β-系数1.11,95%CI [?? 3.03-0.80],p?= 248)。谵妄发生在5例老年患者中发生的AVR,几乎基本上在术后第三天内。除了认知性能之外,STS风险评分可以增强高风险老年患者的鉴定,以更好地进行目标预防性干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号