首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nursing >A comparison of three interactive examination designs in active learning classrooms for nursing students
【24h】

A comparison of three interactive examination designs in active learning classrooms for nursing students

机译:养护理学生主动学习教室中三个互动考试设计的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite the advantages of using active learning strategies in nursing education, researchers have rarely investigated how such pedagogic approaches can be used to assess students or how interactive examinations can be modified depending on circumstances of practice (e.g., in online education). The aim was to compare three interactive examination designs, all based on active learning pedagogy, in terms of nursing students’ engagement and preparedness, their learning achievement, and instructional aspects. A comparative research design was used including final-year undergraduate nursing students. All students were enrolled in a quality improvement course at a metropolitan university in Sweden. In this comparative study to evaluate three course layouts, participants (Cohort 1, n?=?89; Cohort 2, n?=?97; Cohort 3, n?=?60) completed different examinations assessing the same course content and learning objectives, after which they evaluated the examinations on a questionnaire in numerical and free-text responses. Chi-squared tests were conducted to compare background variables between the cohorts and Kruskal–Wallis H tests to assess numerical differences in experiences between cohorts. Following the guidelines of the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS), a sequential mixed-methods analysis was performed on the quantitative findings, and the qualitative findings were used complementary to support the interpretation of the quantitative results. The 246 students who completed the questionnaire generally appreciated the interactive examination in active learning classrooms. Among significant differences in the results, Cohort 2 (e.g., conducted the examination on campus) scored highest for overall positive experience and engagement, whereas Cohort 3 (e.g., conducted the examination online) scored the lowest. Students in Cohort 3 generally commended the online examination’s chat function available for use during the examination. Interactive examinations for nursing students succeed when they are campus-based, focus on student preparation, and provide the necessary time to be completed.
机译:尽管在护理教育中使用了积极学习策略的优势,但研究人员很少调查如何使用这些教学方法来评估学生或如何根据实践环境(例如,在线教育中的情况)进行修改。目的是在护理学生的参与和准备,学习成就和教学方面,比较三个互动考试设计,全部基于主动学习教育学。使用比较研究设计,包括最后一年的本科护理学生。所有学生们都在瑞典大都会大学注册了一个质量改进课程。在该比较研究中,评估三道菜的布局,参与者(群组1,N?=?89;队列2,N?=?97;队列3,N?=?60)完成了评估相同课程内容和学习目标的不同考试之后,他们在数值和自由文本反应中评估了对调查问卷的检查。进行了Chi-Squared测试以比较群组和Kruskal-Wallis H测试之间的背景变量,以评估群组之间的经验中的数值差异。遵循混合方法研究(克的良好报告的指导方针,对定量发现进行了顺序混合方法分析,使用互补的定性发现,以支持对定量结果的解释。完成调查问卷的246名学生普遍赞赏积极学习教室的互动考试。在结果的显着差异中,队列2(例如,在校园考试)中得分最高,以获得总体积极经验和参与,而队列3(例如,在线进行考试)得分最低。队列3的学生通常赞扬在线考试的聊天功能可供考试使用。护理学生的互动考试在校园为基础时成功,专注于学生准备,并提供完成的必要时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号