...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills
【24h】

The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students’ reasoning skills

机译:累积与介绍生物学中的非累积中数的保留益处可能取决于学生的推理技能

获取原文
           

摘要

Assessment has long played an important role as a measurement tool of student mastery over course content. However, testing has also been shown to be an effective learning tool. Cumulative testing, in which all material from the entire learning period is covered, has been assumed to be effective, yet few studies have explicitly tested its effectiveness compared to non-cumulative testing. Studies in psychology and mathematics courses suggest that cumulative final exams increase long-term retention of information, and cumulative testing during the semester can increase cumulative final exam performance and long-term retention. Because frequent testing has also been shown to increase student learning, the purpose of this quasi-experimental study is to investigate the effects of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms on student learning in a course that uses frequent assessment. In this study, one section of an introductory biology course for non-majors was given seven cumulative midterms, with about half of the questions drawn from previous units and the rest covering the current unit. The other section was given seven non-cumulative midterms that focused on current material while other course characteristics were held constant. Student performance on a common, cumulative final exam and a retention exam five months later were compared. Midterm format had no effect on final exam performance, contradicting the few studies done in psychology and mathematics courses. Thus, there may be no additional benefit of cumulative testing if exams are given frequently. Cumulative midterms appeared to increase retention after five months, but only for students who entered the course with low reasoning skills. Interestingly, students with high reasoning skills appeared to retain more from the course if they were given non-cumulative midterms. Possible explanations and ideas for future research are discussed.
机译:评估长期以来,作为学生掌握过往课程内容的测量工具。但是,测试也被证明是一个有效的学习工具。累积测试,其中覆盖了整个学习期的所有材料,已经假设有效,但与非累积测试相比,很少的研究已经明确测试其有效性。心理学和数学课程的研究表明,累计期末考试增加了长期保留了信息,并且在学期期间的累积测试可以增加累积的最终考试表现和长期保留。由于频繁的测试也被证明增加了学生学习,因此该准实验研究的目的是调查累积与非累积中期的疗效在使用频繁评估的课程中学生学习的影响。在这项研究中,非专业介绍生物学课程的一部分被给予七个累积中期,其中大约一半的问题来自之前的单位和覆盖了当前单元的其余部分。另外的部分是给予七个非累积中期的,其专注于当前材料,而其他课程特征保持恒定。比较了五个月后的常见,累积期末考试和保留考试的学生表现。中期格式对最终考试表现没有影响,与心理学和数学课程中的少数研究相矛盾。因此,如果经常给出考试,则可能没有累积测试的额外益处。累积中期似乎在五个月后增加了保留,但仅适用于使用低推理技能进入课程的学生。有趣的是,如果在给予非累积中期的情况下,具有高推理技能的学生似乎从课程中保留更多。讨论了未来研究的可能解释和想法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号