...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for detection of tubercular pleural effusion
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for detection of tubercular pleural effusion

机译:用于检测结核胸腔胸腔积液的Genexpert MTB / RIF测定的诊断准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

India has been engaged in tuberculosis (TB) control activities for over 50 years and yet TB continues to remain India’s important public health problem. The present study was conducted to compare the performance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF (GXpert) assay with composite reference standard in diagnosing cases of tubercular pleural effusion (TPE) and to evaluate the reliability of rifampicin resistance. A cross-sectional study was performed in a Department of Medicine of a rural teaching tertiary care hospital in central India. In all consecutive patients with pleural effusion on chest radiograph presenting to Department of Medicine, GXpert assay and composite reference standard was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of GXpert assay for detecting TPE in comparison to composite reference standard. Standard formulae were used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), positive likelihood ratios (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-). Mc-Nemar’s test was applied to compare variables. All comparisons were two-tailed. We considered the difference to be statistically significant if the P value was less than 0.05. The sensitivity of the GXpert assay in diagnosing TPE was 16.6% among 158 study participants, the specificity was 100% and diagnostic accuracy was 52.5% which was statistically significant (p value 0.05). It had a PPV of 100% (95%CI: 88.3% - 100%) and a NPV of 47.5% (95%CI: 39.3% - 55.7%). The LR+ and LR-were 23.5 (95%CI: 1.43–38.6) and 0.83 (95%CI: 0.76–0.91) respectively. GXpert assay has a very high specificity in diagnosing TPE but has a low sensitivity. In comparison to composite reference standard Thus its clinical utility is limited when used as a standalone test. A physician’s clinical acumen in combination with routine pleural fluid analysis should be the key factor in the diagnosis of TPE in clinically and radiologically suspected patients, especially in high TB burden countries.
机译:印度已经从事结核病(TB)控制活动超过50年,但结核病仍然仍然是印度的重要公共卫生问题。进行本研究以比较Genexpert MTB / RIF(Gxpert)测定与复合参考标准的性能在诊断结核胸腔积液(TPE)中并评估利福平耐药性的可靠性。在印度中部农村教学高等教育医院的医学部进行了横截面研究。在所有连续胸腔积液的胸腔积液患者中呈现给药部,进行了GXPert测定和复合参考标准,以评价GXPert测定与复合参考标准相比检测TPE的诊断准确性。使用标准公式来计算灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),否定预测值(NPV),阳性似然比(LR +)和负似然比(LR-)。 MC-NEMAR的测试应用于比较变量。所有比较都是双尾。如果P值小于0.05,我们认为具有统计学意义的差异。在158项研究参与者中,GXPERT测定在诊断TPE中的敏感性为16.6%,特异性为100%,诊断精度为52.5%,统计学显着(P值<0.05)。它的PPV为100%(95%CI:88.3% - 100%),NPV为47.5%(95%CI:39.3%-55.7%)。 LR +和LR-分别为23.5(95%CI:1.43-38.6)和0.83(95%CI:0.76-0.91)。 Gxpert测定在诊断TPE方面具有非常高的特异性,但具有低灵敏度。与综合参考标准相比,当用作独立测试时,其临床效用是有限的。医生与常规胸膜流体分析相结合的临床敏锐应该是临床和放射性疑似患者诊断TPE的关键因素,特别是在高结核病负担国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号