...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments?
【24h】

Do urban open spaces provide refugia for frogs in urban environments?

机译:城市开放空间是否为城市环境中的青蛙提供了避难所?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Urbanization is among the largest threats to wildlife populations through factors such as fragmentation, isolation, and habitat destruction. Urban open spaces, such as parks and golf courses, have the potential to provide wildlife with suitable habitat within an urbanized matrix. These refugia may be particularly important for amphibians, which represent one of the most endangered and least vagile vertebrate groups on earth. During the spring and summer of 2018, we conducted surveys to determine the presence of anurans at 51 wetland sites within the Piedmont ecoregion of South Carolina. Nearly one-third of these wetlands were located within urban open spaces, one-third in low development areas, and one-third in highly developed areas. Impervious surface and total road length surrounding the wetlands were measured at two scales, a core habitat scale (300 m) and average maximum migration scale (750 m), and we measured several within-wetland habitat variables. Urban Open Space wetlands had levels of surrounding impervious surface similar to High Urbanization wetlands at the larger scale and were intermediate between Low and High Urbanization wetlands at the smaller scale. The total length of road segments occurring within buffers (at both scales) surrounding our study wetlands was higher for Urban Open Space compared to Low and High Urbanization sites. Among the within-wetland variables measured, Low Urbanization sites had higher canopy cover and were more likely to have a terrestrial buffer zone relative to the other categories. Species richness decreased significantly as total road length increased among all wetlands. Wetland category was not a significant driver explaining species richness, but β-diversity was more variable among Urban Open Space wetlands than either Low or High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands did not appear to increase suitability for anurans relative to High Urbanization wetlands. Urban Open Space wetlands had higher variability in species composition, which was perhaps attributable to the diversity among sites represented in the Urban Open Space category.
机译:城市化是通过碎片,隔离和栖息地破坏等因素来对野生动物种群的最大威胁之一。城市开放空间,如公园和高尔夫球场,有可能在城市化矩阵内提供具有合适的栖息地的野生动物。这些避难所对两栖动物来说可能尤为重要,这代表了地球上最濒危和最迷雾的脊椎动物组中的一个。在2018年春季和夏季,我们进行了调查,以确定南卡罗来纳州皮埃蒙特ecoregion的51个湿地景点的灭绝管的存在。这些湿地的近三分之一位于城市开放空间内,三分之一的低开发区,高度发达地区的三分之一。湿地的不透水表面和总路长度在两个尺度上测量,核心栖息地(300米)和平均最大迁移量表(750米),我们测量了几个内部湿地栖息地变量。城市开放空间湿地有周围的不透水表面的水平,类似于较大规模的高城市化湿地,并且在较小的尺度下低和高城市化湿地之间的中间。与低城市化站点相比,我们研究湿地的缓冲区内发生的缓冲区(两种尺度)的总长度较高。在测量的湿地变量中,低城市化地点具有更高的顶篷覆盖,并且更有可能相对于其他类别具有陆地缓冲区。由于所有湿地之间的总路长度增加,物种丰富度显着下降。湿地类不是一个重要的司机解释物种丰富性,但城市开放空间湿地的β-多样性比低城市化湿地更具变量。城市开放空间湿地没有增加对高城市化湿地的适用性。城市开放空间湿地在物种组成方面具有更高的可变性,这可能归因于城市开放空间类别中代表的网站之间的多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号