首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Assessing repetitive negative thinking in daily life: Development of an ecological momentary assessment paradigm
【24h】

Assessing repetitive negative thinking in daily life: Development of an ecological momentary assessment paradigm

机译:评估日常生活中的重复消极思考:生态瞬间评估范式的发展

获取原文
           

摘要

Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is a transdiagnostic process and a promising target for prevention and treatment of mental disorders. RNT is typically assessed via self-report questionnaires with most studies focusing on one type of RNT (i.e., worry or rumination) and one specific disorder (i.e., anxiety or depression). However, responses to such questionnaires may be biased by memory and metacognitive beliefs. Recently, Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) has been employed to minimize these biases. This study aims to develop an EMA paradigm to measure RNT as a transdiagnostic process in natural settings. Based on empirical and theoretical considerations, an item pool was created encompassing RNT content and processes. We then (1) tested model fit of a content-related and a process-related model for assessing RNT as an individual difference variable, (2) investigated the reliability and construct validity of the proposed scale(s), and (3) determined the optimal sampling design. One hundred fifty healthy participants aged 18 to 40 years filled out baseline questionnaires on rumination, worry, RNT, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Participants received 8 semi-random daily prompts assessing RNT over 14 days. After the EMA phase, participants answered questionnaires on depression, anxiety, and stress again. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis revealed excellent model fit for the process-related model but unsatisfactory fit for the content-related model. Different hybrid models were additionally explored, yielding one model with satisfactory fit. Both the process-related and the hybrid scale showed good reliability and good convergent validity and were significantly associated with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress after the EMA phase when controlling for baseline scores. Further analyses found that a sampling design of 5 daily assessments across 10 days yielded the best tradeoff between participant burden and information retained by EMA. In sum, this paper presents a promising paradigm for assessing RNT in daily life.
机译:重复的消极思维(RNT)是一种跨诊断过程,以及对精神障碍的预防和治疗有希望的靶标。通常通过自我报告调查问卷进行评估,这些研究大多数重点关注一种类型的RNT(即担心或谣言)和一种特定疾病(即焦虑或抑郁)。但是,对此类问卷的响应可能被记忆和元认知信仰偏见。最近,已雇用生态瞬间评估(EMA)以最大限度地减少这些偏差。本研究旨在开发EMA范式以测量RNT作为自然环境中的转诊过程。基于实证和理论考虑,创建了一个项目池包含RNT内容和流程。然后我们(1)测试的模型拟合与作为单独差异变量的RNT评估RNT的相关内容相关的模型,(2)研究了所提出的规模和(3)确定的可靠性和构建有效性最佳采样设计。 18至40岁的一百五十名健康参与者填写了基线调查问卷,呼吸,担心,rnt,抑郁症,焦虑和压力症状。参与者收到8个半随机的每日提示,在14天内评估RNT。在EMA阶段之后,参与者再次回答抑郁,焦虑和压力问卷。多级确认因子分析显示了与过程相关模型的优秀模型,但对内容相关模型的适合令人满意。另外探索了不同的混合模型,产生一个令人满意的型号。与过程相关和杂种规模均显示出良好的可靠性和良好的会聚有效性,并且在控制基线评分时,与EMA相时抑郁,焦虑和压力症状显着相关。进一步分析发现,10天的每日评估的抽样设计产生了参与者负担与EMA保留的信息之间的最佳权衡。总而言之,本文介绍了日常生活中评估RNT的有希望的范式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号