首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use
【24h】

Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use

机译:决定点提示是源信誉吗? 增加楼梯使用的准实验田间研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A quasi-experimental field study was undertaken to examine whether the source credibility of point-of-decision (POD) prompts would affect their effectiveness in increasing stair use. POD prompts attributed either to a more credible source, a less credible source, or nothing were randomly installed in three student halls of residence at a public university in Hong Kong (plus a control). The stair and elevator use of residents were recorded by view-from-top surveillance cameras and counted using motion-detection software, resulting in 14,189 observations. The findings show that all the POD prompts can yield, as hypothesized, a significant positive effect on stair use. The relative increase in stair use was 2.49% on average. However, contrary to our second hypothesis, the POD prompt attributed to the more credible source was not the most effective intervention. The implications of these findings are discussed in conclusion.
机译:进行了准实验田间研究,以检查决定点(POD)提示的源信誉是否会影响其在增加楼梯使用时的有效性。 Pod提示归因于更可靠的来源,一个不太可靠的来源,或者在香港公共大学的三名学生居住大厅(加上一个控制)中,无论是无可可辩的消息人士。 居民的楼梯和电梯使用被视图 - 从顶部监控摄像机记录并使用运动检测软件计算,导致14,189个观察结果。 调查结果表明,所有POD都会提示可以屈服,如假设,对楼梯使用的显着积极影响。 楼梯使用的相对增加平均为2.49%。 然而,与我们的第二个假设相反,归因于更可靠的来源的POD提示不是最有效的干预。 结论讨论了这些发现的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号