首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Anxiety Impacts Consent Capacity to Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease
【24h】

Anxiety Impacts Consent Capacity to Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease

机译:焦虑会影响阿尔茨海默病治疗的同意能力

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aimed to clarify how behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and cognitive function affect the decision-making capacity of persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a real informed consent situation about anti-dementia drug prescriptions. The participants were 76 patients with AD. We used the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool to assess the capacity for consent to treatment (MacCAT-T). We simultaneously used the Mini-Mental State Examination, Executive Interview, Executive Clock Drawing Task, Logical Memory I of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (LM I), LM II, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) to assess cognitive function and psychiatric symptoms. We calculated the correlations between the MacCAT-T scores and the demographic, neuropsychological, and psychiatric variables. Once the univariable correlations were determined, we performed simple linear regression analyses to examine if the regression equations were significant. In the final analyses, we incorporated significant variables into stepwise multiple linear regression analyses to determine the most significant predictors of mental capacity. Age (β = ?0.34), anxiety (β = ?0.27), and LM I (β = 0.26) were significant predictors of “understanding” (adjusted R 2 = 0.29). LM II (β = 0.39), anxiety (β = ?0.29), and education (β = 0.21) were significant predictors of “understanding of alternative treatments” (adjusted R 2 = 0.30). Anxiety (β = ?0.36) and age (β = ?0.22) were significant predictors of “appreciation” (adjusted R 2 = 0.18). Age (β = ?0.31) and anxiety (β = ?0.28) were significant predictors of explained variance in “reasoning” (adjusted R 2 = 0.17). Patients with anxiety had lower scores on all five MacCAT-T subscales: “understanding,” without 3.8 [ SD = 1.2] vs. with 2.6 [ SD = 1.1]; “understanding of alternative treatments,” without 2.9 [ SD = 2.2] vs. with 1.3 [ SD = 1.8]; “appreciation,” without 2.9 [ SD = 1.1] vs. with 1.9 [ SD = 1.2]; “reasoning,” without 4.0 [ SD = 2.0] vs. with 2.7 [ SD = 1.7]; and “expressing a choice,” without 1.9 [ SD = 0.4] vs. with 1.5 [ SD = 0.6]. Considering the effects of BPSD, cognitive function, and age/education when assessing consent capacity in persons with AD is important. Reducing anxiety may contribute to improved capacity in persons with AD.
机译:本研究旨在阐明痴呆症(BPSD)和认知功能的行为和心理症状如何影响阿尔茨海默病(AD)的决策能力,在实际知情的抗痴呆毒品处方的情况下。参与者是76名AD患者。我们使用麦卡尔能力评估工具来评估同意治疗的能力(Maccat-T)。我们同时使用了迷你精神状态考试,执行时钟绘图任务,威奇勒记忆量表规模(LM I),LM II和神经精神存量库存(NPI)的逻辑存储器I,以评估认知功能和精神症状。我们计算了Maccat-T分数与人口统计学,神经心理学和精神病变量之间的相关性。一旦确定了不可变度的相关性,我们执行了简单的线性回归分析,以检查回归方程是否显着。在最终分析中,我们将显着的变量纳入逐步多线性回归分析,以确定精神能量最重要的预测因子。年龄(β= 0.34),焦虑(β= 0.27),LM I(β= 0.26)是“理解”的显着预测因子(调节R 2 = 0.29)。 LM II(β= 0.39),焦虑(β= 0.29),教育(β= 0.21)是“替代治疗的理解”的显着预测因子(调节R 2 = 0.30)。焦虑(β= 0.36)和年龄(β= 0.22)是“升值”的显着预测因子(调整后R 2 = 0.18)。年龄(β= 0.31)和焦虑(β= 0.28)是“推理”(调整后R 2 = 0.17)解释差异的显着预测因子。焦虑患者在所有五个MACCAT-T分量下都有较低的分数:“理解”,没有3.8 [SD = 1.2]与2.6 [SD = 1.1]; “了解替代治疗”,没有2.9 [SD = 2.2]与1.3 [SD = 1.8]; “升值”,没有2.9 [SD = 1.1]与1.9 [SD = 1.2]; “推理”,“没有4.0 [SD = 2.0]与2.7 [SD = 1.7];和“表达选择”,没有1.9 [SD = 0.4]与1.5 [SD = 0.6]。考虑到BPSD,认知功能和年龄/教育在评估广告人员的同意能力时的影响很重要。减少焦虑可能有助于在广告中提高能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号