首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Perceived Stress and Coping Strategies Among Undergraduate Health Science Students of Jimma University Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: Online Cross-Sectional Survey
【24h】

Perceived Stress and Coping Strategies Among Undergraduate Health Science Students of Jimma University Amid the COVID-19 Outbreak: Online Cross-Sectional Survey

机译:在Covid-19爆发中,吉米大学本科卫生科学生的感知压力和应对策略:在线横断面调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The rapid spread of COVID-19 infection has led countries across the globe to take various measures to contain the outbreak, including the closure of Universities. Forcing University students to stay at home has created enormous stress and uncertainty in their daily life. Objective: This study aimed to assess the perceived stress and coping strategies among undergraduate health science students of Jimma University amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Materials and methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 337 undergraduate health science students from August to September 5, 2020. The perceived stress scale (PSS)-10 and Brief-COPE scale were used to assess the level of stress and coping strategies, respectively. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 22 was employed for data analysis. Logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of high perceived stress. Results: The overall mean [±standard deviation (SD)] age of the participants was 22.88 (±1.78) years. The mean (±SD) PSS score was 22.16 (±1.41), and high perceived stress was reported in 121 (35.9%) participants. The overall mean (±SD) coping score was 72.34 (±12.31), and approach coping was the predominantly used strategy for coping with stress. Personal perception of being stressed by the daily number of COVID-19 cases/deaths in Ethiopia (AOR = 4.61, p 0.01), rare online talk/chat with friends (AOR = 4.07, p = 0.01), presence of confusion due to the inconsistent strategies developed by the health/government authorities in view of the scientific recommendations (AOR = 2.22, p = 0.01), perception of self/family members being at risk of getting sick (AOR = 0.53, p = 0.03), decreased household income following the COVID-19 pandemic (AOR = 3.92, p = 0.01), practicing denial (AOR = 1.34, p 0.01), self-blame (AOR = 1.23, p = 0.02), planning (AOR = 1.28, p = 0.01), and religion (AOR = 1.41, p 0.01) as means of coping with stress were associated with high perceived stress. Conclusion: Over one-third of the participants had a high level of perceived stress, and the majority of them were practicing effective means of coping with stress. The authors recommend that the hosting University in collaboration with the concerned bodies develop innovative strategies to improve the psychological well-being of the students.
机译:背景:Covid-19感染的迅速传播在全球范围内采取了各国,采取各种措施,遏制爆发,包括大学的闭幕。迫使大学生在家里留在日常生活中产生了巨大的压力和不确定性。目的:这项研究旨在评估吉米大学本科医生科学生在Covid-19爆发中的感知压力和应对策略。材料和方法:在2020年8月5日涉及337名本科卫生科学生进行的在线横断面调查。使用的压力量表(PSS)-10和简短的守则规模用于评估压力和应力水平策略分别。用于社会科学(SPSS)版本22的统计包用于数据分析。进行了物流回归,以确定高感知压力的预测因子。结果:参与者年龄的总体平均值[±标准偏差(SD)]为22.88(±1.78)年。平均值(±SD)PSS得分为22.16(±1.41),121名(35.9%)参与者报告了高感应的应力。总体平均值(±SD)应对分数为72.34(±12.31),方法应对是主要使用策略,用于应对压力。个人对埃塞俄比亚的每日Covid-19病例/死亡人数(AOR = 4.61,P&LT; 0.01)强调(AOR = 4.07),罕见的在线谈话/聊天(AOR = 4.07,P = 0.01),由于困惑的存在鉴于科学建议(AOR = 2.22,P = 0.01),对健康/政府当局制定的不一致策略(AOR = 2.22,P = 0.01),对自主/家庭成员存在生病的风险(AOR = 0.53,P = 0.03),减少家庭收入在Covid-19大流行(AOR = 3.92,P = 0.01),练习拒绝(AOR = 1.34,P <0.01),自责(AOR = 1.23,P = 0.02),规划(AOR = 1.28, P = 0.01),以及宗教(AOR = 1.41,P <0.01)作为应对应力的手段与高感知应力相关。结论:超过三分之一的参与者具有高水平的感知压力,其中大多数人正在练习应激的有效手段。作者建议托管大学与有关机构合作制定创新策略,以改善学生的心理健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号