...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Asymmetric Underlying Mechanisms of Relation-Based and Property-Based Noun–Noun Conceptual Combination
【24h】

Asymmetric Underlying Mechanisms of Relation-Based and Property-Based Noun–Noun Conceptual Combination

机译:基于关系的基于关系的不对称基础机制,基于物业的名词概念组合

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Conceptual combination is a fundamental human cognitive ability by which people can experience infinite thinking by artfully combining finite knowledge. For example, one can instantly combine “cactus” and “fish” together as “prickly fish” even if one has never previously heard of a “cactus fish.” Although two major combinatorial types—property and relational combinations—have been identified, the underlying processes of each remain elusive. This study investigates the asymmetric processing mechanisms underlying property and relational combinations by examining differential semantic activation during noun–noun conceptual combination. Across two experiments utilizing each combinatorial process as semantic priming and implementing a lexical decision task immediately after combination, we measure and compare the semantic activation patterns of intrinsic and extrinsic semantic features in these two combinatorial types. We found converging evidence that property and relational combinations involve asymmetric semantic information and entail distinct processing mechanisms. In property combination, the intrinsic feature in the modifier concept showed greater activation than the semantic feature of the same dimension in the head concept. In contrast, in relational combination, the extrinsic semantic feature in the head concept and the whole modifier concept showed similar levels of activation. Moreover, our findings also showed that these patterns of semantic activation occurred only when the combinatorial process was complete, indicating that accessing the same lexical-semantic information is not sufficient to observe asymmetric patterns. These findings demonstrate that property combination involves replacing a specific semantic feature of the head noun with that of the modifier noun, whereas relational combination involves completing the semantic feature of the head noun with the whole modifier concept. We discuss the implications of these findings, research limitations, and future research directions.
机译:概念组合是一种基本的人类认知能力,人们可以通过艺术结合有限知识来体验无限思维。例如,一个可以立即将“仙人掌”和“鱼”在一起作为“刺鱼”,即使从未听说过“仙人掌鱼”,即使是从未听过的“仙人掌鱼”也是如此。虽然已经确定了两种主要的组合类型和关系组合,但每个主要的过程都仍然难以捉摸。本研究通过检查名词概念组合期间检查差异语义激活来研究基础性质和关系组合的非对称处理机制。在两个实验中,利用每个组合过程作为语义启动和组合后立即实施词汇决策任务,我们测量并比较这两个组合类型中的内在和外在语义特征的语义激活模式。我们发现融合证据,即财产和关系组合涉及不对称语义信息,并导致不同的处理机制。在性质组合中,修改器概念中的内在特征显示出比头概念中相同维度的语义特征更大的激活。相比之下,在关系组合中,头部概念中的外在语义特征和整个修改器概念显示出类似的激活水平。此外,我们的研究结果还表明,只有在组合过程完成时,才会发生这些语义激活模式,表明访问相同的词汇语义信息不足以观察不对称模式。这些发现表明,性能组合涉及用修饰符名词的头部名词的特定语义特征替换,而关系组合涉及完成具有整个修改器概念的头部名词的语义特征。我们讨论了这些发现,研究限制和未来研究方向的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号