首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Development of Experimental Materials on Moral Judgment in Sport: Evidence From Chinese Athletes
【24h】

Development of Experimental Materials on Moral Judgment in Sport: Evidence From Chinese Athletes

机译:体育道德判决实验材料的发展:中国运动员的证据

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives: The existing scales for moral judgment in sport have some limitations when used for cognitive neural research. Developing a set of experimental materials with good validity is thus warranted. The purpose of this study was to develop experimental materials that can be used in cognitive neuroscience research on moral judgment in sport. Design: Study 1 was a qualitative study and Study 2 used a within-subject design. Method: In Study 1, a qualitative method was adopted to assess types of moral misconduct among Chinese athletes, based on news reports of Chinese athletes' moral misconduct collected from the Internet and from interviews with Chinese elite athletes. In Study 2, typical examples were selected from a qualitative analysis based on the types of moral misconduct observed among athletes in Study 1. The examples were then compiled, controlled, and modified. The validity of the developed experimental materials was evaluated. Results: The moral misconduct observed in Chinese athletes can be divided into the following four categories: violent behavior, doping, match-fixing or tanking, and self-reported dishonesty. Subject analysis and item analysis consistently found that the experimental materials developed for moral judgment based on the four categories were significantly different in six aspects, including the rate of participants' agreement to the proposed resolution [ F Subject(3, 184) = 236.60, p = 0.00; F Item(3, 156) = 471.17, p = 0.00], decision time [ F Subject(3, 184) = 23.69, p = 0.00; F Item(3, 156) = 3.13, p = 0.03], moral conflict [ F Subject(3, 184) = 3.70, p = 0.01; F Item(3, 156) = 10.71, p = 0.00], moral acceptability of the behavior [ F Subject(3, 184) = 58.22, p = 0.00; F Item(3, 156) = 110.69, p = 0.00], emotional valence [ F Subject(3, 184) = 3.41, p = 0.02; F Item(3, 156) = 3.11, p = 0.03], and emotional arousal [ F Subject(3, 184) = 1.32, p = 0.27; F Item(3, 156) = 5.09, p = 0.00]. The experimental materials developed were not affected by the type of sport. Conclusions: The developed experimental materials can be used as experimental materials for cognitive neuroscience research on moral judgment in sport.
机译:目标:在用于认知神经研究时,运动中的道德判决的现有规模具有一些局限性。因此,有效地开发一套具有良好有效性的实验材料。本研究的目的是开发实验材料,可用于对体育道德判决的认知神经科学研究。设计:研究1是一个定性的研究和研究2使用了对象设计。方法:在研究1中,采用了一种定性方法来评估中国运动员之间的道德不当行为类型,基于中国运动员的道德不当行为与中国精英运动员采访的新闻报道。在研究2中,根据研究中观察到的研究中观察到的运动员的道德不当行为的类型,选择了典型的实例。然后编制,控制和改性实施例。评估了显影实验材料的有效性。结果:在中国运动员中观察到的道德不当行为可分为以下四类:暴力行为,兴奋剂,匹配固定或坦克,以及自我报告的不诚实。主题分析和物品分析一致发现,基于四个类别的道德判断产生的实验材料在六个方面有显着差异,包括参与者协议的达成议定书[F主题(3,184)= 236.60,p = 0.00; F项目(3,156)= 471.17,P = 0.00],决策时间[F主题(3,184)= 23.69,P = 0.00; F项目(3,156)= 3.13,P = 0.03],道德冲突[F主题(3,184)= 3.70,P = 0.01; F项(3,156)= 10.71,P = 0.00],行为的道德可接受性[F主题(3,184)= 58.22,p = 0.00; F项目(3,156)= 110.69,P = 0.00],情绪化价[F主题(3,184)= 3.41,P = 0.02; F项目(3,156)= 3.11,P = 0.03],情绪唤起[F主体(3,184)= 1.32,P = 0.27; F项目(3,156)= 5.09,p = 0.00]。产生的实验材料不受运动类型的影响。结论:开发的实验材料可用作体育道德判决认知神经科学研究的实验材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号