...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Imaginative Enrichment Produces Higher Preference for Unusual Music Than Historical Framing: A Literature Review and Two Empirical Studies
【24h】

Imaginative Enrichment Produces Higher Preference for Unusual Music Than Historical Framing: A Literature Review and Two Empirical Studies

机译:富有想象力的富集对不寻常的音乐偏好而不是历史框架:文献综述和两个实证研究

获取原文

摘要

Does accompanying information (“framing”) such as in a program note influence our preference for music? To date the findings have been mixed, although a small body of research has suggested that when framing accompanies music considered unusual (characterized by extreme complexity and extreme unfamiliarity), the music may be preferred compared to when no such framing occurs. A literature review (study 1) revealed that for 50% of experiments where valenced framing (positive versus negative suggestions of prestige) was manipulated, positive framing was accompanied by significantly higher ratings of preference and/or quality judgements. However, only one example contained music that could be considered unusual (atonal music). We therefore conducted two follow-up experiments, with each examining the influence of valenced framing as well as historical framing (accompanying historical details) for music intended to be unusual. Study 2 manipulated framing for an excerpt using atonal music, although we were unable to find evidence that positively valenced historical framing increased preference for this piece. A surprising finding in study 2 was that our active control—requiring the participant to engage imaginatively with the music—produced a significant increase in preference. Subsequently, in study 3 we examined the same three framing conditions and included both an unusual excerpt (free jazz) as well as an over-familiar, typical excerpt for comparison (being a repeatedly pre-exposed classical piano piece). Study 3 produced no significant differences in preference ratings between the two historical conditions, although a positive impact of imagination was again evident. We concluded that the impact of historical framing may be highly subjective and not of favorable consequence to the typical listener. Furthermore, while imaginative engagement appears a fruitful avenue for further preference research, it has been largely ignored.
机译:伴随信息(“框架”),例如程序记录会影响我们对音乐的偏好?迄今为止,发现已经混合了,虽然一小部分研究表明,当框架伴随音乐被认为是不寻常的(以极端复杂性和极端的不熟悉的特征)时,与不发生这种框架时,音乐可能是优选的。文献综述(研究1)显示,对于50%的实验,有价值的框架(威尔望的正负建议)被操纵,积极的框架伴随着偏好和/或质量判断的显着提高。然而,只有一个例子包含可以被认为是不寻常的(局部音乐)的音乐。因此,我们进行了两次后续实验,每次检查价值框架的影响以及历史框架(随附的历史细节)旨在变得异常。研究2使用Atonal Music进行摘录操纵框架,虽然我们无法找到积极衡量的历史框架的证据,但对这件作品的偏好增加。在研究2中令人惊讶的发现是我们的主动控制 - 要求参与者在偏好的偏好增加的显着增加方面可以想象地搞。随后,在研究3中,我们检查了相同的三个框架条件,包括一个不寻常的摘录(自由爵士乐)以及比较的超熟悉的典型摘录(是一个反复暴露的古典钢琴件)。研究3在两个历史条件之间产生了偏好评级的偏好差异,尽管想象力的积极影响再次明显。我们得出结论,历史框架的影响可能是高度主观的,对典型听众的影响不是有利的结果。此外,虽然富有想象力的敬意似乎是进一步偏好研究的富有成果的途径,但它基本上被忽略了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号