首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Analyzing Large-Scale Studies: Benefits and Challenges
【24h】

Analyzing Large-Scale Studies: Benefits and Challenges

机译:分析大规模研究:利益和挑战

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The analysis of (inter)national large-scale assessments (LSAs) promises representativity oftheir results and statistical power and has the ability to reveal even minor effects. LSAs’international grounding verifies previous findings that might previously have been biased by theirfocus on Western and industrialized countries. This contribution will discuss these promises,contextualizing them via methodical challenges and interpretation caveats that are able to tapthe potential of LSAs for educational psychology. Evidence of this contribution is grounded inprevious analyses of Program for International Student Assessment (PISA; Schleicher, 2019) andProgram for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC; OECD, 2013), twointernationally repeated cross-sectional studies. Many aspects we bring up can also apply to severalother international large-scale studies, such as TIMSS, PIRLS, and ICILS.1 We also refer to thenational longitudinal study German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS; Blossfeld et al., 2011)to include a perspective on longitudinal studies in this paper. Implications for large-scale studieswithin the context of learning and teaching round off our paper in its closing section.
机译:(Inter)国家大规模评估(LSAS)的分析承诺对该人的结果和统计能力的代表性,并且能够揭示甚至次要影响。 LSAS'ILTNITIONATIONATIONATIONATION验证以前可能在西部和工业化国家偏离的先前调查结果。这一贡献将讨论这些承诺,通过能够利用LSA的潜力来挖掘他们的教育心理学的潜力和解释警告来讨论这些承诺。这一贡献的证据是对国际学生评估计划(PISA; Schleicher,2019)的基础分析,并为国际成人能力评估(PIAAC; OECD,2013),经两个反复横断面研究。我们提出的许多方面也可以适用于Timss,Pirls和Icils的多个国际大规模研究.1我们还参考目前的纵向研究德国国家教育小组研究(Neps; Blossfeld等,2011)包括本文纵向研究的视角。对大规模研究的影响在其闭幕部分中学习和教学的背景下的背景下的背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号