首页> 外文期刊>Methodological Innovations >The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small-scale cannabis growers
【24h】

The challenges and benefits of analyzing feedback comments in surveys: Lessons from a cross-national online survey of small-scale cannabis growers

机译:分析调查中的反馈意见的挑战和益处:来自小型大麻种植者的跨国在线调查的课程

获取原文
       

摘要

It is common practice in survey questionnaires to include a general open and non-directive feedback question at the end, but the analysis of this type of data is rarely discussed in the methodological literature. While these open-ended comments can be useful, most researchers fail to report on this issue. The aim of this article is to illustrate and reflect upon the benefits and challenges of analyzing responses to open-ended feedback questions. The article describes the experiences of coding and analyzing data generated through a feedback question at the end of an international online survey with small-scale cannabis cultivators carried out by the Global Cannabis Cultivation Research Consortium. After describing the design and dataset of the web survey, the analytical approach and coding frame are presented. The analytical strategies chosen in this study illustrate the diversity and complexity of feedback comments which pose methodological challenges to researchers wishing to use them for data analyses. In this article, three types of feedback comments (political/policy comments, general comments of positive and negative appreciation, and methodological comments) are used to illustrate the difficulties and advantages of analyzing this type of data. The advantages of analyzing feedback comments are well known, but they seem to be rarely exploited. General feedback questions at the end of surveys are typically non-directive. If researchers want to use these data for research and analyses, they need a clear strategy. They ought to give enough thought to why they are including this type of question, and develop an analytical strategy at the design stage of the study.
机译:调查问卷中的常见做法是在最后包括一般开放和非指示反馈问题,但在方法文献中很少讨论对这种类型的数据的分析。虽然这些开放式评论可能很有用,但大多数研究人员都无法报告此问题。本文的目的是说明和反思分析对开放式反馈问题的响应的好处和挑战。本文介绍了在国际在线调查结束时编码和分析通过反馈问题生成的数据,并通过全球大麻培养研究联盟进行的小型大麻培养运器进行了国际在线调查。在描述Web调查的设计和数据集之后,提出了分析方法和编码帧。本研究中选择的分析策略说明了反馈评论的多样性和复杂性,这些评论对希望使用它们进行数据分析的研究人员构成方法论挑战。在本文中,使用三种类型的反馈意见(政治/政策评论,对积极升值和方法论评论的一般性评论)用于说明分析这种类型数据的困难和优势。分析反馈评论的优点是众所周知的,但它们似乎很少被剥削。调查结束时的一般反馈问题通常是非指令。如果研究人员想要使用这些数据进行研究和分析,他们需要明确的策略。他们应该给予足够的想法,为什么他们包括这种类型的问题,并在研究的设计阶段开发分析策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号