首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Coping Strategies and Self-Efficacy in University Students: A Person-Centered Approach
【24h】

Coping Strategies and Self-Efficacy in University Students: A Person-Centered Approach

机译:在大学生的应对策略和自我效能:以人为本的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

In daily academic life, students are exposed to a wide range of potentially stressful situations which could negatively affect their academic achievement and their health. Among the factors that could be weakened by academic stress, attention has been paid to expectations of self-efficacy, which are considered one of the most important determinants for student engagement, persistence, and academic success. From a proactive perspective, research on academic stress has emphasized the importance of coping strategies in preventing harmful consequences. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in discovering the extent to which individuals are able to combine different coping strategies and the adaptive consequences this flexibility entails. However, studies using this person-centered approach are still scarce in the academic context. On that basis, this current study had two objectives: (a) to examine the existence of different profiles of university students based on how they combined different approach coping strategies (positive reappraisal, support seeking, and planning) and (b) to determine the existence of differences in general expectations of self-efficacy between those coping profiles. A total of 1,072 university students participated in the study. The coping profiles were determined by latent profile analysis (LPA). The differences in the self-efficacy variable were determined using ANCOVA, with gender, university year, and degree type as covariates. Four approach coping profiles were identified: (a) low generalized use of approach coping strategies; (b) predominance of social approach coping approaches; (c) predominance of cognitive approach coping approaches; and (d) high generalized use of approach coping strategies. The profile showed that a greater combination of the three strategies was related to higher general self-efficacy expectations and vice versa. These results suggest that encouraging flexibility in coping strategies would help to improve university students’ self-efficacy.
机译:在日常学术生活中,学生接触到广泛的潜在压力情况,这可能会对他们的学术成就及其健康产生负面影响。在可以通过学术压力削弱的因素中,对自我效能的预期有所关注,这些是学生参与,持久性和学术成功的最重要决定因素之一。从主动的角度来看,学术压力研究强调了应对策略在预防有害后果方面的重要性。近年来,在发现个人能够结合不同的应对策略和这种灵活性需要的适应性后果的程度,越来越兴趣。然而,使用这种以本人为中心的方法的研究仍然在学术背景下稀缺。在此基础上,本研究有两个目标:(a)根据如何组合不同方法应对策略(积极重新评价,支持和规划)和(b)来审查大学生不同曲线的存在那些应对型材之间自效的一般预期差异存在。共有1,072名大学生参加了这项研究。应对型材通过潜在曲线分析(LPA)确定。自我效能变量的差异使用Ancova确定,性别,大学年度和程度类型作为协变量。鉴定了四种接受应对型材:(a)低广义使用方法应对策略; (b)社会方法的主要职位应对方法; (c)认知方法应对方法的优势; (d)高广义使用方法应对策略。该简介表明,三种策略的更大组合与普遍的自我效能预期有关,反之亦然。这些结果表明,鼓励应对策略的灵活性将有助于改善大学生的自我效能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号