...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >A Qualitative Analysis of Oncology Patient Awareness of Medication Shortages and Their Preferences for How Shortages Should Be Managed
【24h】

A Qualitative Analysis of Oncology Patient Awareness of Medication Shortages and Their Preferences for How Shortages Should Be Managed

机译:对药物短缺的肿瘤患者意识的定性分析及其对如何进行缺水的偏好

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE:Medication shortages in US hospitals are ongoing, widespread, and frequently involve antineoplastic and supportive medications used in cancer care. The ways shortages are managed and the ways provider-patient communication takes place are heterogeneous, but the related preferences of oncology patients are undefined. This study sought to qualitatively evaluate patient preferences.METHODS:A cross-sectional, semi-structured interview study was conducted from January to June 2019. Participants were adult oncology inpatients who received primary cancer care at the University of Chicago, had undergone treatment within 2 years, and had 1 or more previous hospitalizations during that period. Participants (n = 54) were selected consecutively from alternating hematology and oncology services. The primary outcome was thematic saturation across the domains of awareness of medication shortages, principle preferences regarding decision makers, preferences regarding allocation of therapy drugs, and allocation-related communication.RESULTS:Thematic saturation was reached after 39 participants completed the study procedures (mean age, 59.6 years [standard deviation, 14.5 years]; men made up 61.5% of the study population [mean age, 24 years]; response rate, 72.0%). In all, 18% of participants were aware of institutional medication shortages. Patients preferred having multiple decision makers for allocating medications in the event of a shortage. A majority of patients named oncologists (100%), ethicists (92%), non-oncology physicians (77%), and pharmacists (64%) as their preferred decision makers. Participants favored allocation of drugs based on their efficacy (normalized weighted average, 1.3), and they also favored prioritizing people who were already receiving treatment (1.8), younger patients (2.0), sicker patients (3.1), and those presenting first for treatment (5.3). Most participants preferred preferred disclosure of supportive care medication shortages (74%) and antineoplastic medication shortages (79%) for equivalent substitutions.CONCLUSION:In a tertiary-care center with medication shortages, few oncologic inpatients were aware of shortages. Participants preferred having multiple decision makers involved in principle-driven allocation of scarce medications. Disclosure was preferred when their usual medications needed to be substituted with equivalent alternatives. These preliminary data suggest that preferences do not align with current management practices for medication shortages.
机译:目的:美国医院的药物短缺正在进行,广泛,经常涉及癌症护理中使用的抗肿瘤和支持性药物。管理短缺的方式,提供提供者 - 患者通信的方式是异质的,但肿瘤学患者的相关偏好是未定义的。该研究寻求定性评估患者偏好。方法:从2019年1月至6月进行了横断面的半结构化访谈研究。参与者是在芝加哥大学接受原发性癌症护理的成人肿瘤科,在2中经历了治疗多年来,在此期间有1个或更多的住院治疗。参与者(n = 54)是从交替血液学和肿瘤学服务中连续选择的。主要结果是对药物缺乏认识领域的主题饱和度,关于决策者的原则偏好,关于治疗药物分配的偏好以及分配相关的沟通。结果:在39人完成研究程序后达到主题饱和度(平均年龄,59.6岁[标准差,14.5岁];男性占研究人群的61.5%[平均年龄,24岁];响应率,72.0%)。总而言之,18%的参与者了解制度化药物短缺。优选的患者在发生短缺情况下具有多个决策者分配药物。大多数名为肿瘤学家(100%),伦理学家(92%),非肿瘤医生(77%)和药剂师(64%)的患者为他们首选决策者。参与者赞成基于疗效的药物分配(规范化加权平均值,1.3),他们还赞助已经接受治疗的人(1.8),更年轻的患者(2.0),病情患者(3.1),以及首先进行治疗的人(5.3)。大多数参与者优先优选的支持性护理药物短缺(74%)和抗肿瘤药物短缺(79%)用于等效取代的短缺(79%)。结论:在患有药物短缺的初级护理中心,很少有肿瘤住院患者意识到短缺。参与者首选有多个决策者参与原则驱动的稀缺药物的分配。当需要用等效替代方案取代时,当常用的药物时,是优选的。这些初步数据表明,偏好不与当前管理措施进行药物短缺的管理实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号