首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >Survey of Principal Investigators in Biobanking: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Research Behaviors About Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients
【24h】

Survey of Principal Investigators in Biobanking: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Research Behaviors About Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients

机译:生物管理中主要调查人员的调查:跨性别和性别多样性患者的知识,态度和研究行为

获取原文
           

摘要

PURPOSE:Biobanks usually do not collect transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) demographic information, hindering research on cancer risk and biological effects related to gender-affirming interventions.METHODS:In August 2019, 172 scientists involved in biobanking research at a single institution (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) were invited to complete a survey measuring knowledge and attitudes about TGD health and research practices. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.RESULTS:Among 47 respondents, there was high agreement (77%) regarding the importance of collecting TGD identities and histories of gender-affirming treatments with biospecimens, which was contrasted by low self-reported rates of respondents’ biorepositories allowing for the entry of TGD identities (14.9%) and histories of gender-affirming interventions (8.5%). There was high interest in receiving education regarding the unique cancer health needs of TGD patients (74%), and knowledge questions yielded high percentages of “neutral” and “don’t know or prefer not to answer” responses. After completing the survey, confidence in knowledge of health needs for TGD patients decreased significantly (48.9% were confident during the presurvey assessment v 36.2% in the postsurvey assessment; P < .001). Qualitative analysis of open-ended questions indicated overall support of TGD data inclusion in biobanks along with perceived barriers to inclusion of such data in biobanks.CONCLUSION:To our knowledge, this was the first study of researchers to assess knowledge, attitudes, and research practices regarding TGD patients. Overall, there was limited knowledge about TGD health and cancer needs and low rates of TGD demographic data collection but a high interest in receiving education regarding this community.
机译:目的:Biobanks通常不会收集变性和性别不同(TGD)人口信息,妨碍与性别肯定干预相关的癌症风险和生物学效应的研究。方法:2019年8月,172名科学家参与了一个机构的生物管理研究( H. Lee Moffitt癌症中心和研究院,坦帕,佛罗里达州)被邀请完成关于TGD健康和研究实践的测量知识和态度。进行定量和定性分析。结果:在47名受访者中,有关收集TGD身份和与生物起草的性别肯定治疗的重要性的重要性(77%),这是由低自我报告的受访者对比的对比生物制定者允许进入TGD身份(14.9%)和性别肯定干预史(8.5%)。对接受TGD患者的独特癌症健康需求的接受教育有很高的兴趣(74%),知识问题产生了高百分比的“中立”和“不知道或不知道或不回答”的反应。在完成调查后,对TGD患者的健康需求知识的信心显着下降(48.9%在Presurvey评估期间对PostSurve评估的36.2%相信; P <.001)。开放式问题的定性分析表明,在Biobanks中将此类数据纳入Biobanks的TGD数据包含在Biobanks中的总体支持。结论:对我们的知识,这是研究人员评估知识,态度和研究实践的第一次研究关于TGD患者。总体而言,关于TGD健康和癌症需求的知识有限,TGD人口数据收集的低利率,但对接受有关该社区的教育的兴趣很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号