...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions >The accuracy of temporal upscaling of instantaneous evapotranspiration to daily values with seven upscaling methods
【24h】

The accuracy of temporal upscaling of instantaneous evapotranspiration to daily values with seven upscaling methods

机译:用七种升高方法将瞬时蒸散量升高的时间升高的准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

This study evaluated the accuracy of seven upscaling methods in simulating daily latent heat flux (LE) from instantaneous values using observations from 148 global sites under all sky conditions and at different times during the day. Daily atmospheric transmissivity ( τ ) was used to represent the sky conditions. The results showed that all seven methods could accurately simulate daily LE from instantaneous values. The mean and median of Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency were 0.80 and 0.85, respectively, and the corresponding determination coefficients were 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. The sine and Gaussian function methods simulated mean values with relatively higher accuracy, with relative errors generally within ± 10?%. The evaporative fraction (EF) methods, which use potential evapotranspiration and incoming shortwave radiation, performed relatively better than the other methods in simulating daily series. Overall, the EF method using potential evapotranspiration had the highest accuracy. However, the sine function and the EF method using extraterrestrial solar irradiance are recommended in upscaling applications because of the relatively minimal data requirements of these methods and their comparable or relatively higher accuracy. The intra-day distribution of the LE showed greater consistency with the Gaussian function than the sine function. However, the accuracy of simulated daily LE series using the Gaussian function method did not improve significantly compared with the sine function method. The simulation accuracy showed a minor difference when using the same type of method, for example, the same type of mathematical function or EF method. In any upscaling scheme, the simulation accuracy from multi-time values was significantly higher than that from a single-time value. Therefore, when multi-time data are available, multi-time values should be used in evapotranspiration upscaling. The upscaling methods show the ability to accurately simulate daily LE from instantaneous values from 09:00 to 15:00, particularly for instantaneous values between 11:00 and 14:00. However, outside of this time range the upscaling methods performed poorly. These methods can simulate daily LE series with high accuracy at τ ? ?0.6 ; when τ ? ?0.6 , simulation accuracy is significantly affected by sky conditions and is generally positively related to daily atmospheric transmissivity. Although every upscaling scheme can accurately simulate daily LE from instantaneous values at most sites, this ability is lost at tropical rainforest and tropical monsoon sites.
机译:本研究评估了七种升高方法在模拟日常潜热通量(LE)中使用从所有天空条件下的148个全球部位和不同时间的观测来模拟瞬时值的准确性。每日大气透射率(τ)用于表示天空条件。结果表明,所有七种方法都可以从瞬时值准确地模拟日常le。 NASH-SUTCLIFFE效率的平均值和中位数分别为0.80和0.85,相应的测定系数分别为0.87和0.90。正弦和高斯函数方法模拟精度相对较高的平均值,相对误差通常在±10±10范内。使用潜在的蒸发和传入的短波辐射的蒸发级分(EF)方法比模拟每日系列中的其他方法表现相对较好。总体而言,使用潜在蒸散蒸料的EF方法具有最高的精度。然而,由于这些方法的数据要求和其可比或相对更高的准确性,建议在升高应用中使用外星太阳辐照度的正弦功能和EF方法。 LE的日内分布显示比正弦功能更大的高斯功能一致。然而,与立高斯函数方法的模拟日常le系列的准确性与正弦功能法相比没有显着改善。当使用相同类型的方法时,模拟精度显示出次要差异,例如,相同类型的数学函数或EF方法。在任何升级方案中,来自多时间值的模拟精度明显高于单时间值。因此,当多时间数据可用时,应在evapotranspiration Upcaling中使用多时间值。上升方法显示了从09:00到15:00的瞬时值准确地模拟日常le的能力,特别是在11:00到14:00之间的瞬时值。然而,在此时间范围之外,升高方法表现不佳。这些方法可以在τ的高精度上模拟每日LE系列? & ?0.6;什么时候τ? ?0.6,模拟精度受天空条件的显着影响,与日常大气透射率一般呈正相关。虽然每次上级方案都可以在大多数地点的瞬时值准确地模拟日常le,但这种能力在热带雨林和热带季风遗址上丢失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号