首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pediatrics >Commentary: Association of Umbilical Cord Milking vs. Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping With Death or Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage Among Preterm Infants
【24h】

Commentary: Association of Umbilical Cord Milking vs. Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping With Death or Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage Among Preterm Infants

机译:评论:脐带挤奶的关联与早产儿延迟脐带夹紧或严重脑室内出血

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The quality of care in the first “golden” minutes of life of a newborn, especially if born preterm, can profoundly influence later-life outcomes. A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials demonstrated that placental transfusion strategies (both delayed cord clamping and cord milking performed at birth) vs. immediate cord clamping significantly reduced intraventricular hemorrhage and mortality in preterm newborn less than 31 weeks gestation (1). Two metaanalyses demonstrated that cord milking or delayed cord clamping compared with immediate cord clamping in premature newborns was associated with a reduced risk of all-grade intraventricular hemorrhage or mortality, respectively (2, 3). Thus, both delayed cord clamping and cord milking at birth seem to be protective compared with immediate cord clamping in preterm newborns. Instead, immediate cord clamping is still a routine care at birth performed worldwide, above all in very preterm newborns.
机译:新生儿的第一个“金”少数“金”纪要的护理质量,特别是在出生的早产,可以深刻地影响后生命的结果。 12种随机对照试验的META分析表明,胎盘输血策略(在出生时进行的延迟帘线夹紧和脐带挤奶)与直接绳索夹紧显着降低了脑室内出血和死亡人新生儿的死亡率少于31周的妊娠(1)。 两种metaAnalyses证明,与早产新生儿的直接帘线夹紧相比,帘线挤奶或延迟帘线夹紧与分别为所有级腔内出血或死亡率的风险降低(2,3)。 因此,与早产新生儿的直接绳索夹紧相比,出生时的延迟线夹紧和脐带挤奶似乎是保护性的。 相反,立即绳索夹紧仍然是全世界的出生时的常规护理,最重要的是在非常预先的新生儿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号