首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Physicians' Earnings Do Not Affect Their Online Ratings
【24h】

Physicians' Earnings Do Not Affect Their Online Ratings

机译:医生的盈利不会影响他们的在线评级

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Physician-rating websites have exploded in popularity in recent years. Consequently, these sites have garnered attention from researchers interested in factors influencing patient satisfaction. A doctor's earnings might reflect practice patterns that could influence their patients' perceptions. We sought to explore any association between physicians' earnings and their online ratings. Methods: The names and billings of 500 physicians from British Columbia, Canada were randomly extracted from the 2016-17 BC Blue Book and matched to their profiles on RateMDs.com . Physicians' earnings were compared to their global ratings and to their Staff, Punctuality, Helpfulness, and Knowledge scores. Earnings and ratings were also compared between men and women, as well as between family medicine, surgical, and internal medicine and subspecialties cohorts. Results: We found no significant correlation between physicians' earnings and their global online ratings ( p = 0.304). Weak negative correlations existed between earnings and Staff and Helpfulness ratings (Spearman's rho = ?0.055, p 0.001; rho = ?0.033, p 0.028). Online ratings were largely favorable (mean MD rating of 3.85/5. Male physicians earned significantly more than their female colleagues ($371,734.85 and $261,590.82, respectively; p 0.001), but no significant difference existed between men and women with regards to online ratings (mean 3.87 and 3.81, respectively, p = 0.191). Surgical and Family Medicine specialties showed a negative correlation between income and ratings; no relationship was seen in the internal medicine and subspecialties cohort. Conclusions: No meaningful association was found between physicians' earnings and their online ratings, although there is an impact of specialty grouping. Patients tend to review doctors favorably online; these data add to the discussion of whether male and female doctors are differentially rated. Trends toward increased transparency in health care systems may help to elucidate how doctors' earnings influence patients' perception of and satisfaction with the care they receive.
机译:目的:近年来,医生评级网站爆发了受欢迎程度。因此,这些网站已经从对影响患者满意度的因素感兴趣的研究人员获得关注。医生的盈利可能反映了可能影响患者感知的实践模式。我们试图探索医生盈利与其在线评级之间的任何关联。方法:从2016-17 BC蓝图中随机提取来自不列颠哥伦比亚省的500名医师的名称和账单,并与Ratemds.com上的概要文件随机提取。将医生的收入与他们的全球评级和工作人员,准时,乐于助人和知识分数进行比较。男性和女性之间以及家庭医学,手术和内科和亚特色队列之间也比较了收益和评级。结果:我们发现医生盈利与全球在线评级之间没有显着相关性(P = 0.304)。盈利和员工之间存在薄弱的负相关性和助人的评级(Spearman的Rho = 0.055,P <0.001; RHO =Δ033,P <0.028)。在线评级在很大程度上有利(平均MD评级为3.85 / 5。男性医生分别比其女性同事(分别为371,734.85美元和261,590.82美元)赢得了大幅增加;男女之间没有关于在线评级的男女之间没有显着差异(平均3.87和3.81分别,P = 0.191)。手术和家庭医学特产在收入和评级之间存在负相关性;内科和亚特色队列中没有任何关系。结论:医师收入之间没有发现有意义的协会及其在线评级,虽然专业分组存在影响。患者倾向于在网上有利地审查医生;这些数据增加了对男性和女性医生是差异评级的讨论。卫生保健系统透明度提高的趋势可能有助于阐明医生的盈利如何影响患者对他们收到的照顾的对患者的感知和满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号