...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Diagnostic Value of Serum Biomarkers for Differentiating Central and Peripheral Causes of Acute Vertigo
【24h】

Diagnostic Value of Serum Biomarkers for Differentiating Central and Peripheral Causes of Acute Vertigo

机译:血清生物标志物诊断急性眩晕中枢和外周原因的诊断价值

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: In patients presenting with acute vertigo or dizziness, distinguishing central from peripheral is a diagnostic challenge. This study investigated potential serum markers for differentiating central and peripheral vertigo in patients with acute-onset vertigo. Methods: This prospective case–control study recruited consecutive participants from the Emergency Department, including patients with acute-onset vertigo or dizziness within 12 h and control subjects. We used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to measure the serum S100β, NSE, BDNF, GFAP, and IL-6 levels during the acute period. Results: The 114 study subjects included 28 patients with central vertigo (CV), 49 patients with peripheral vertigo (PV), and 37 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. No differences were found in risk factor distribution among the three groups. In patients with CV, the serum NSE and S100β levels were significantly ( p 0.05) elevated compared with the control and PV groups. The ROC analysis gave an AUC of 0.843 (95% CI = 0.753–0.932) for NSE and 0.787 (95% CI = 0.687–0.886) for S100β for predicting CV. However, there were no significant differences in the serum GFAP and BDNF levels among the CV, PV, and control groups. Conclusions: Serum NSE and S100β levels are significantly higher in patients with CV, such as occurs with posterior circulation ischemic stroke or vertebrobasilar insufficiency. S100β and NSE may serve as serum biomarkers for differentiating between CV and PV in patients with acute-onset vertigo.
机译:背景:在患有急性眩晕或头晕的患者中,区分中央周边是诊断挑战。本研究研究了潜在的血清标记,用于区分急性发作眩晕患者中的中枢和外周眩晕。方法:该潜在病例对照研究招募了急诊部门的连续参与者,包括急性发作眩晕或12小时内眩晕的患者和控制受试者。我们使用酶联免疫吸附试验测量急性期间血清S100β,NSE,BDNF,GFAP和IL-6水平。结果:114项研究受试者包括28例中枢眩晕(CV),49例外周眩晕(PV)和37名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。三组危险因素分布没有发现差异。在CV患者中,与对照和PV基团相比,血清NSE和S100β水平显着(P <0.05)。 ROC分析对于S100β,NSE和0.787(95%CI = 0.753-0.932)的AUC为0.843(95%CI = 0.753-0.932),用于预测CV。然而,CV,PV和对照组中的血清GFAP和BDNF水平无显着差异。结论:CV患者血清NSE和S100β水平显着较高,例如随后循环缺血性卒中或椎体梭内不足而发生。 S100β和NSE可以作为血清生物标志物,用于区分急性发作眩晕患者的CV和PV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号