...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease >Deep sedation vs femoral block anesthesia: beat-by-beat hemodynamic impact on TAVI procedure
【24h】

Deep sedation vs femoral block anesthesia: beat-by-beat hemodynamic impact on TAVI procedure

机译:深度镇静与股骨阻断麻醉:对Tavi程序的逐次血液动力学影响

获取原文

摘要

Background: In spite of the increased use of Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) due to the better patient selection, well-trained operators and improved technology, the choice of the best anesthesia regimen remains an open question. In particular, it remains to be clarified whether deep sedation (DS) in spontaneous breathing or femoral local anesthesia (LA) is best. Objective: This study compared the hemodynamic variations determined by deep sedation (DS) with spontaneous breathing and local femoral anesthesia (LA) in 2 groups of patients submitted to TAVI with two different kinds of anesthesia, using a beat-by-beat pulse contour method (MostCare ?-UP ). Methods: 82 patients with severe aortic stenosis and similar baseline characteristics and indications underwent trans-femoral TAVI: 50 with LA and 32 with DS. All patients were submitted to minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring. The following parameters were measured: pressure indexes : systolic, diastolic, mean (SysP, DiaP, MAP) and dicrotic (DicP) pressures; flow indexes : cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV); ventriculo-arterial coupling indexes (VAC): peripheral arterial elastance (Ea P ), systemic vascular resistance (SVR); cardiovascular system performance : cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE), dP/dt max_rad . Results: The TAVI procedure was successful in 89% of patients (VARC-2 criteria) with no difference between the 2 groups. Anesthesia induction determined a higher decrease of pressures in DS than in LA (P0.01) with no differences in CO. The VAC parameters (Ea P , SVR) decreased (P0.01) in DS with an improvement in CCE (P0.001); these parameters did not change in LA. The post-TAVI flow and VAC parameters, especially Ea, increased (P0.05) more significantly in the LA group than in the DS group (P0.001). Using logistic regression, the occurrence of the post-TAVI aortic regurgitation was correctly associated with the pressure gradient MAP-DicP in 63% of the study population (P=0.033). This association was more effectively detected in the LA group (78%, P=0.011) with a ROC AUC=0.779, than the DS group. Conclusion: The use of the pulse contour method to track the fast-hemodynamic changes during the TAVI procedure proved suitable for the aim. As expected, LA and DS induced different pre-TAVI hemodynamic conditions, which influenced the post-TAVI hemodynamic changes. The hemodynamic conditions induced by LA, enabled the occurrence of post-TAVI aortic regurgitation to be detected more effectively.
机译:背景:尽管使用更好的患者选择,训练有素的运算符和改进的技术,但跨导管主动脉瓣植入(Tavi)的使用增加,但最佳麻醉方案的选择仍然是一个开放的问题。特别是,它仍然澄清是否在自发呼吸或股骨局部麻醉(LA)中是最佳的深度镇静(DS)。目的:这项研究比较了由深镇静(DS)测定的血流动力学变化,在2组患者中与自发呼吸和本地股骨麻醉(La)用两组患者用两种不同的麻醉,使用逐拍脉冲轮廓方法(大多数?-up)。方法:82例严重主动脉狭窄患者及类似的基线特征和适应症接受了反式股骨Tavi:50,带有DS和32。所有患者均已提交至多侵入性血液动力学监测。测量以下参数:压力指数:收缩,舒张,平均值(SYSP,DIAP,MAP)和Dicrotic(DICP)压力;流量指数:心输出(CO),行程量(SV);脑室 - 动脉偶联指数(VAC):外周动脉弹性(EA P),全身血管阻力(SVR);心血管系统性能:心循环效率(CCE),DP / DT MAX_RAD。结果:Tavi程序在89%的患者(VARC-2标准)中成功,2组之间没有差异。麻醉诱导确定DS中的压力降低而不是在La(P <0.01)中,没有CO的差异。VIC参数(EA P,SVR)降低(P <0.01),具有CCE的改善(P <0.001 );这些参数在洛杉矶没有改变。在La组中,Tavi流程和VAC参数,特别是EA,在La组中的增加(P <0.05)比DS组更大(P <0.001)。使用逻辑回归,后TAVI主动脉反冲的发生与63%的研究人群中的压力梯度图DICP正确相关(P = 0.033)。在La Group(78%,P = 0.011)中更有效地检测到该关联,ROC AUC = 0.779比DS组。结论:使用脉冲轮廓方法跟踪TAVI过程中的快速血液动力学变化,证明了适用于瞄准。正如预期的那样,LA和DS诱导不同的Pre-Tavi血液动力学条件,这影响了Tavi后血流动力学变化。由La引起的血流动力学条件使得能够更有效地检测到Tavi主动脉性反流的发生。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号