首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Saliva Is a Promising Alternative Specimen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Children and Adults
【24h】

Saliva Is a Promising Alternative Specimen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Children and Adults

机译:唾液是一种有助于检测儿童和成人SARS-COV-2的替代标本

获取原文
           

摘要

Testing efforts for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for health care workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to that of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. ABSTRACT Testing efforts for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for health care workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to that of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS was compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordances for saliva and NPS were 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The values for positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS were 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva yielded detection of 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. For symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA, 82.4% versus 85.3%). The overall values for PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva yielding detection of 4 fewer cases than NPS. However, saliva performance for symptomatic adults was identical to NPS performance (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate sample choice alternative to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults.
机译:对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-COV-2)的测试努力受到检测材料和保健工人个人防护设备的稀缺。唾液收集的简单和无痛过程允许广泛的测试,但与鼻咽拭子(NPS)样本相比,可变性能的热情受到阻碍。摘要对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-COV-2)的测试努力受到检测材料和保健工人个人防护设备的稀缺。唾液收集的简单和无痛过程允许广泛的测试,但与鼻咽拭子(NPS)样本相比,可变性能的热情受到阻碍。我们从300名独特的成人和儿科患者中预先收集配对的NPS和唾液样本。使用TaqPath Covid-19组合套件(Thermo Fisher),在32.2%(97/300)中检测到32.2%(97/300)中的SARS-COV-2 RNA。无论样品类型如何,均唾液和NPS比较阳性总数。唾液和NPS的整体齐全程度分别为91.0%(273/300)和94.7%(284/300)。唾液和NPS的正百分比(PPA)的值分别为81.4%(79/97)和89.7%(87/97)。唾液产生了10个阳性病例,其受NPS阴性。对于未诊断患有Covid-19未被诊断的症状性和无症状的儿科患者,唾液和NPS的性能是可比的(PPA,82.4%与85.3%)。唾液和NPS的成人PPA的总价值分别为83.3%和90.7%,唾液产生4个案例比NPS少4例。然而,症状性成年人的唾液性能与NPS性能相同(PPA为93.8%)。具有较低的成本和自集功能,唾液可以是NPS的适当样本选择替代,用于检测儿童和成人中的SARS-COV-2。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号