首页> 外文期刊>Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering >Systematic Approach for Selecting a Cleaning Method to Solar Panels Based on the Preference Selection Index Approach
【24h】

Systematic Approach for Selecting a Cleaning Method to Solar Panels Based on the Preference Selection Index Approach

机译:基于偏好选择索引方法选择太阳能电池板的清洁方法的系统方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Policymakers have become eager to move towards sustainability recently due to the growing costs of electricity and concerns about the environment. Environment friendly and economical energy sources, such as solar power, are being introduced at increasing rates. Photovoltaic (PV) panels are considered an important method of harnessing solar power. Although solar energy is one of the most efficient renewable and sustainable sources of energy, the accumulation of dust and debris on even one panel in a PV array reduces the efficiency of energy generation, thus highlighting the need to keep the surfaces of PV panels clean. Several methods can be used to clean PV panels, such as Heliotex technology, electrostatic cleaning, the use of self-cleaning glass, automatic cleaning and manual cleaning. The Preference Selection Index (PSI) multicriteria decision-making approach is used in this study to compare these cleaning methods. Data were collected via a survey of solar energy experts in Jordan to enable a comparison of these cleaning methods, and several attributes were considered. After the initial PSI analysis, a follow-up sensitivity analysis was conducted that involved removing the cost attributes. The results showed that the best method was manual cleaning. The results of the sensitivity analysis confirmed that manual cleaning is the method most often preferred by experts.
机译:政策制定者最近渴望实现可持续性,因为由于对环境的越来越多的电力成本和担忧。环境友好且经济的能源,如太阳能,正在升高。光伏(PV)面板被认为是利用太阳能的重要方法。尽管太阳能是最有效的可再生能源和可持续的能源来源之一,但在PV阵列中甚至一个面板上的灰尘和碎片的积累降低了能量产生的效率,从而突出了保持PV面板表面的需要清洁。几种方法可用于清洁PV面板,如Heliotex技术,静电清洁,使用自清洁玻璃,自动清洁和手动清洗。本研究中使用偏好选择索引(PSI)多标准决策方法来比较这些清洁方法。通过对约旦的太阳能专家调查来收集数据,以实现这些清洁方法的比较,并考虑了几个属性。在初始PSI分析之后,进行了后续敏感性分析,涉及去除成本属性。结果表明,最好的方法是手动清洁。灵敏度分析的结果证实,手动清洁是专家最常见的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号