...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Materials Journal >Clinical performance of two different adhesive strategies for metal-ceramic cracks repairing and related in vitro study
【24h】

Clinical performance of two different adhesive strategies for metal-ceramic cracks repairing and related in vitro study

机译:两种不同粘合策略的临床表现,用于修复和相关的金属陶瓷裂缝造型及其相关性研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To evaluate the bonding reliability of a universal adhesive compared to a commercial ceramic repair system for metal-ceramic cracks. In vitro part: sixty specimens with porcelain, metal and porcelain-metal substrate were fabricated. Half specimens were bonded by Singlebond Universal adhesive and Filtek Z350 resin composite. The other were processed by Ceramic Repair N. Shear bond strength was tested. In vivo part: forty patients with sixty ceramic fractured porcelain-fused-metal restorations were involved. Half were repaired by Singlebond Universal and Filtek Z350. The other were restored by Ceramic Repair N. The mean observation period was 65 weeks. Results showed the bond strength ranged from 13.97 MPa to 15.85 MPa using two different repair system on different substrate with no statistical difference. There was no statistical difference between the two adhesive system in survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. The universal adhesive had a similar repair performance compared to commercial ceramic repair system.
机译:与用于金属陶瓷裂缝的商业陶瓷修复系统相比,评估通用粘合剂的粘合可靠性。 体外部分:制造瓷,金属和瓷金属基材的六十型试样。通过单稳联粘合剂和FIRTEK Z350树脂复合材料键合半标本。另一个由陶瓷修复加工。测试剪切粘合强度。 在体内部分:涉及六十个陶瓷骨折瓷器融合金属修复物的四十名患者。一半由单额通用和FILTEK Z350修复。另一个由陶瓷修复恢复N.平均观察期为65周。结果表明,在不同的基材上使用两种不同的修复系统,粘合强度为13.97MPa至15.85MPa,没有统计差异。根据Kaplan-Meier分析,两种粘合剂系统之间的粘合剂系统之间没有统计差异。与商业陶瓷修复系统相比,通用粘合剂具有类似的修复性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号