...
首页> 外文期刊>SSM - Population Health >What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education
【24h】

What does (low) education mean in terms of dementia risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis highlighting inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education

机译:(低)教育在痴呆症风险方面是什么意思? 系统审查和荟萃分析突出了衡量和运营教育的不一致

获取原文

摘要

Low education is considered an important modifiable risk factor for dementia worldwide, despite the lack of a formal consensus definition of low education. The primary aim of this systematic review was to document and address the inconsistency in measuring and operationalising education in dementia studies. A secondary aim was to consider the dose of education required to reduce dementia risk. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO with registration ID CRD42018096168. CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycInfo, and Pubmed databases were searched using terms related to education, dementia and/or MCI, and incidence. Studies were eligible for inclusion if a risk ratio for education and any dementia, Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Vascular Dementia (VaD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) was reported in a population cognitively healthy at baseline. Sample sizes for 65 studies meeting selection criteria ranged from 152 to 12,881, representing populations from 24 countries. Risk of bias, assessed using a tool designed specifically for dementia risk studies, was found to be medium or low for all studies. There were 23 continuous, 29 dichotomous, and 31 categorical operationalisations of education reported. Random effects meta-analyses from continuous operationalisations suggested each year of education reduced risk by eight percent for AD (95% CI:5–12%) and seven percent for any dementia (95% CI:6–9%). Dichotomous operationalisations indicated an increased risk for low education of 45% (95% CI:29–63%) for any dementia and 85% (95% CI:56–118%) for AD, however definitions of low education were heterogeneous, ranging from zero to 12 years. There were too few studies to produce summary ratios for VaD or MCI. We conclude that, while the evidence of an association between low education and dementia incidence is robust, inconsistency in the definition, measurement and operationalisation of education hinders the translation of this evidence into practical policy recommendations to reduce dementia risk.
机译:尽管缺乏对低等教育的正式共识的定义,但低教育被认为是全球痴呆症的重要意义危险因素。该系统审查的主要目的是记录并解决痴呆症研究中衡量和运营教育的不一致。二次目的是考虑减少痴呆症风险所需的教育剂量。该协议在Prospero注册了注册ID CRD42018096168。使用与教育,痴呆症和/或MCI相关的条款进行搜索CINAHL,Cochrane,Psycinfo和PubMed数据库,以及发病。如果教育风险比和任何痴呆症,阿尔茨海默病(AD),血管痴呆(AD),血管痴呆(VAD)或轻度认知障碍(MCI)在基线上的人群中报告了学习,则有资格包列。 65项研究的样本尺寸会议选择标准的范围从152到12,881中,代表24个国家的人口。使用专为痴呆风险研究设计的工具评估的偏差风险被发现是所有研究的中等或低。有23个连续的,29个二分法,以及31种分类的教育作品报告。随机效应持续运营的META分析建议每年的教育降低8%的风险,适用于AD(95%CI:5-12%)和七分之七(95%CI:6-9%)。二分法运营表明,对于任何痴呆的低教育风险增加45%(95%CI:29-63%),AD的85%(95%CI:56-118%),但低教育的定义是异质的,测距从零到12年。少数研究可以为VAD或MCI产生概要比率。我们得出结论,虽然低教育和痴呆症发病率之间的关联的证据是强大的,教育的定义,测量和运营中的不一致阻碍了这一证据的翻译成实际的政策建议,以减少痴呆症风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号