...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >INTRA-ARTICULAR MORPHINE AND ROPIVACAINE INJECTION PROVIDES EFFICACIOUS ANALGESIA COMPARED TO FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK IN THE FIRST 24 HOURS POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH BTB IN AN ADOLESCENT COHORT
【24h】

INTRA-ARTICULAR MORPHINE AND ROPIVACAINE INJECTION PROVIDES EFFICACIOUS ANALGESIA COMPARED TO FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK IN THE FIRST 24 HOURS POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH BTB IN AN ADOLESCENT COHORT

机译:关节内吗啡和Ropivacaine注射率为股骨神经阻滞与股骨神经阻滞相比,在一次性队列中的BTB重建后的前24小时内与股骨神经嵌段相比,与股骨神经阻滞相比

获取原文

摘要

Background: Opioid consumption and patient satisfaction are influenced by a surgeon’s pain management protocol and the use of adjunctive pain mediators. Two commonly utilized adjunctive pain modifiers for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction include femoral nerve blockade and intra-articular injection; however, debate remains as to the most efficacious methodology. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesize that intra-articular injection with ropivacaine and morphine is as efficacious as a femoral nerve block injection of ropivacaine, dexamethasone, and dexmedetomidine for post-operative pain management in the first 24 hours after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) ACL reconstruction. Methods: Charts were retrospectively reviewed for a single pediatric orthopedic surgeon performing BTB ACL reconstructions from 2013-2019. One hundred sixteen patients were identified, of whom 58 received intra-articular injection and 58 received single shot femoral nerve block. All patients were admitted for 24 hours. Pain scores were assessed every 4 hours. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed were tabulated for each patient. Results: Opioid use was 24.3 MMEs in patients treated with intra-articular injection vs 28.5MMEs in those with peripheral block (p=0.108). Consumption of MMEs was greater in the intra-articular group in the 0-4 hours period (7.1 MMEs vs. 4.6 MMEs, p=0.008). There was significantly less MME consumption in patients receiving intra-articular injection compared with peripheral block at 16-20 and 20-24 hours (3.2 MMEs vs. 5.6 MMEs, p=0.01; 3.8 MMEs vs. 6.5 MMEs, p&0.001 respectively). Mean pain scores were not significantly different over the 24-hour period (peripheral block=2.7, intra-articular injection=3.0, p=0.19). Conclusion: Moving away from the use of peripheral nerve block as an analgesic modality may be challenging given the multidisciplinary role of pain management in these patients. However, as Ramlogan et al. succinctly noted in their recent editorial “Anterior cruciate ligament repair and peripheral nerve blocks: time to change our practice?” in the British Journal of Anesthesia, both orthopedic and anesthesia colleagues alike are beginning to recognize that it is a change that may benefit our patients. Our study strengthens this argument and shows that there is no significant difference in MME consumption between the femoral nerve block and intra-articular injection groups in the first 24 hours post-operatively. While peripheral block is associated with lower opioid consumption in the first 4 hours after surgery, patients receiving intra-articular block require less opioids 16-24 hours post-operatively. Given these findings, we propose that intra-articular injection is a viable alternative for analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction.
机译:背景:阿片类药物消费和患者满意度受外科医生止痛管理方案的影响和辅助疼痛调解器的影响。两种常用的辅助止痛剂用于前十字韧带(ACL)重建包括股神经阻滞和关节内注射;但是,辩论仍然是最有效的方法。假设/目的:我们假设与Ropivacaine和吗啡的关节内注射患者是股骨神经阻滞的股骨神经阻滞,骨对髌骨肌腱 - 骨骨前24小时后患者疼痛管理的股骨神经阻滞剂,如股骨神经阻断注射BTB)ACL重建。方法:从2013 - 2019年开始审查单个儿科骨科外科医生的次户外矫形外科医生的图表。鉴定了一百十六名患者,其中58例接受关节内注射,58名接受单次股骨穴神经阻滞。所有患者均被录取24小时。每4小时评估疼痛评分。为每位患者制表所消耗的吗啡毫克当量(MME)。结果:在用外围块中的关节内注射率与28.5mMES的患者治疗的患者中,ApioID使用是24.3毫米(P = 0.108)。在0-4小时内,在关节内组中,MME的消耗更大(7.1 mmes与4.6 mmes,p = 0.008)。在16-20和20-24小时(3.2mmes与5.6mmes,P = 0.01; 3.8 mmes与6.5 mmes,p& 0.00 mmes,p& 0.001分别)。平均疼痛评分在24小时内(外周嵌段= 2.7,关节内注射= 3.0,P = 0.19)没有显着差异。结论:鉴于这些患者疼痛管理的多学科作用,止痛性模块的使用可能是挑战的。然而,正如Ramlogan等人一样。他们最近的简明扼要地注意到了“前十字架韧带修复和周围神经块:时间来改变我们的练习?”在英国麻醉杂志中,骨科和麻醉同事都是开始认识到这是一种可能使我们患者受益的变化。我们的研究加强了这一论点,并表明,在可操作地,股骨神经块和关节内注射组之间的MME消耗没有显着差异。虽然外周块在手术后的前4小时内与较低的阿片样物质消耗相关,但接受关节内块的患者可操作地需要较少的16-24小时。鉴于这些发现,我们提出了关节内注射是在进行BTB ACL重建的儿科患者中镇痛的可行替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号