...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Obesity >Harnessing technological solutions for childhood obesity prevention and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current applications
【24h】

Harnessing technological solutions for childhood obesity prevention and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current applications

机译:利用儿童肥胖预防和治疗技术解决方案:当前应用的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Technology holds promise for delivery of accessible, individualized, and destigmatized obesity prevention and treatment to youth. This review examined the efficacy of recent technology-based interventions on weight outcomes. Seven databases were searched in April 2020 following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were: participants aged 1-18 y, use of technology in a prevention/treatment intervention for overweight/obesity; weight outcome; randomized controlled trial (RCT); and published after January 2014. Random effects models with inverse variance weighting estimated pooled mean effect sizes separately for treatment and prevention interventions. Meta-regressions examined the effect of technology type (telemedicine or technology-based), technology purpose (stand-alone or adjunct), comparator (active or no-contact control), delivery (to parent, child, or both), study type (pilot or not), child age, and intervention duration. In total, 3406 records were screened for inclusion; 55 studies representing 54 unique RCTs met inclusion criteria. Most (89%) included articles were of high or moderate quality. Thirty studies relied mostly or solely on technology for intervention delivery. Meta-analyses of the 20 prevention RCTs did not show a significant effect of prevention interventions on weight outcomes (d = 0.05, p = 0.52). The pooled mean effect size of n = 32 treatment RCTs showed a small, significant effect on weight outcomes (d = 0.13, p = 0.001), although 27 of 33 treatment studies (79%) did not find significant differences between treatment and comparators. There were significantly greater treatment effects on outcomes for pilot interventions, interventions delivered to the child compared to parent-delivered interventions, and as child age increased and intervention duration decreased. No other subgroup analyses were significant. Recent technology-based interventions for the treatment of pediatric obesity show small effects on weight; however, evidence is inconclusive on the efficacy of technology based prevention interventions. Research is needed to determine the comparative effectiveness of technology-based interventions to gold-standard interventions and elucidate the potential for mHealth/eHealth to increase scalability and reduce costs while maximizing impact.
机译:技术拥有向青年提供无障碍,个性化和估计的肥胖预防和治疗的承担承担承诺。本综述检测了最近基于技术的干预措施对体重结果的疗效。在PRISMA指南之后,4月2020年4月搜索了七个数据库。纳入标准是:参与者1-18岁,在预防/治疗干预中使用技术的超重/肥胖;重量结果;随机对照试验(RCT);并发表于2014年1月后。随机效应模型,逆转差异估计汇总平均效应分别用于治疗和预防干预措施。元回归检测了技术类型(基于远程医疗或技术)的效果,技术目的(独立或辅助或辅助),比较器(主动或无接触控制),递送(对父母,儿童或两者),研究类型(飞行员或不),儿童年龄和干预持续时间。总共筛选了3406条记录纳入; 55研究代表54个独特的RCT符合纳入标准。大多数(89%)包括高或质量的文章。三十项研究主要或完全依赖于干预交付技术。 20预防RCT的Meta分析没有显示重量结果的预防干预措施的显着效果(d = 0.05,p = 0.52)。 N = 32治疗RCT的汇总平均效果大小表现出对重量结果的小,显着影响(D = 0.13,P = 0.001),但是33种治疗研究(79%)在治疗和比较器之间没有发现显着差异。对试点干预的结果有明显更大的治疗效果,与儿童的干预措施与亲本交付的干预措施相比,作为儿童年龄的增加和干预持续时间减少。没有其他亚组分析是显着的。基于技术的基于技术的儿科肥胖的干预措施表现出对重量的小效果;然而,证据是基于技术的预防干预措施的疗效来归咎于缺乏。需要研究以确定基于技术的干预措施对金牌的比较有效性,并阐明MHECHEATI / EHEALT的潜力,以提高可扩展性,并在最大化影响的同时降低成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号