首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Disaster Risk Science >Forecast Hesitancy: Why are People Reluctant to Believe, Accept, or Respond to Various Weather, Water, and Climate Hazard-Related Forecasts?
【24h】

Forecast Hesitancy: Why are People Reluctant to Believe, Accept, or Respond to Various Weather, Water, and Climate Hazard-Related Forecasts?

机译:预测犹豫不决:为什么人们不愿意相信,接受或回应各种天气,水和气候危害相关预测?

获取原文
           

摘要

Current discussions of the social phenomenon of “vaccine hesitancy” with regard to Covid-19 provide an opportunity to use hesitancy as a means to shift thinking about untimely and delayed responses to forecasts of hydrometeorological hazards. Hesitancy, that is, provides a paradigm through which such regrettably delayed responses to hydromet hazards might be better understood and effectively addressed.?Without exaggeration, just about every hydromet event provides an example of how hesitancy hinders individual, community, and national government risk-reducing preventive and mitigative responses to forecasts of foreseeable, relatively near-term climate, water, or weather hazards. Reasons for such hesitancy (for vaccine and forecast use alike) include—among others—lack of trust in the science, lack of confidence in government, and persistent concern about the uncertainties that surround forecasting—both meteorological and public health. As such, a better understanding of the causes that lead to individual and group hesitancy can better inform hydromet forecasters and affected communities about ways in which beneficial actions in response to timely forecasts are often delayed. This better understanding will facilitate, where necessary, targeted interventions to enhance the societal value of forecasting by reducing this long-observed challenge of “forecast hesitancy.”?First, this article focuses on incidents of “vaccine hesitancy” that, for various reasons, people around the world are even now experiencing with regard to several now-available, and confirmed efficacious, Covid-19 vaccines. Reports of such incidents of indecisiveness first increased dramatically over the first few months of 2021, despite the strong scientific confidence that vaccination would significantly lower personal risk of contracting as well as spreading the virus. After, the notion of forecast hesitancy with regard to hydrometeorological hazards is discussed. It’s not what you say, it’s what people hear . -Frank Luntz (2007)
机译:目前对Covid-19“疫苗犹豫不决”的社会现象的目前讨论提供了一种利用犹豫的机会,以便将思考的手段转移到延迟思考对水形气象危害预测的思考。犹豫不决,即提供了对水表灾害的这种遗憾延迟的响应可能更好地理解和有效地解决了.?Without夸大,只是关于每个水管事件的一个例子,提供了濒临灭绝的个人,社区和国家政府风险的例子减少预防和缓解预测,预测可预见的,相对接近的气候,水或天气危害。对这种犹太人(用于疫苗和预测使用相似的原因)包括 - 与其他人缺乏对科学的信任,对政府缺乏信心,并持续关注环绕着气象和公共卫生的不确定性。因此,更好地了解导致个人和群体犹豫不决的原因可以更好地通知水表预报员和受影响的社区,了解响应及时预测的有益行为的方式通常延迟。在必要时,这种更好的理解将有助于在必要时期的干预措施来提高通过减少“预测犹豫不决”的长期挑战的预测的社会价值世界各地的人们甚至正在经历几个现代,并确认有效的Covid-19疫苗。尽管有强烈的科学信心,疫苗接种会显着降低承包的危险以及扩散病毒的危险性,但在2021年的前几个月内首先急剧增加的报告急剧增加。之后,讨论了关于水样危害的预测犹豫不决。这不是你说的,这就是人们听到的。 -Frank Luntz(2007)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号