...
首页> 外文期刊>Informatics in Medicine Unlocked >The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:Covid-19疾病中人工智能辅助CT成像的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched. We used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess all included studies' quality and potential bias. A hierarchical receiver-operating characteristic summary (HSROC) curve and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve have been implemented. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Finally, 36 studies (a total of 39,246 image data) were selected for inclusion into the final meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for AI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90–0.92) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98). For deep learning (DL) method, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87–0.88) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97). In case of machine learning (ML), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90–0.91), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94–0.95) and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99). AI in COVID-19 patients is useful in identifying symptoms of lung involvement. More prospective real-time trials are required to confirm AI's role for high and quick COVID-19 diagnosis due to the possible selection bias and retrospective existence of currently available studies.
机译:人工智能(AI)系统在支持决策方面变得至关重要。该系统审查总结了CoVID-19的AI辅助CT扫描预测精度上目前可用的所有数据。系统地搜索了科学,Cochrane图书馆,PubMed,Scopus,Cinahl,Science Direct,Prospero和Embase的ISI网站。我们利用经修订的诊断准确性研究质量评估(Quadas-2)工具来评估所有包括的研究的质量和潜在偏见。已经实现了分层接收器操作特征摘要(HSROC)曲线和摘要接收器操作特征(SROC)曲线。计算曲线下的区域(AUC)以确定诊断准确性。最后,选择36项研究(共39,246个图像数据),以包含到最终的荟萃分析中。 Ai的汇集灵敏度为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.91(95%CI,0.90-0.92),AUC为0.96(95%CI,0.91-0.98)。对于深度学习(DL)方法,汇集的敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.88(95%CI,0.87-0.88),AUC为0.96(95%CI,0.93-0.97)。在机器学习(m1)的情况下,汇集的敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.95(95%CI,0.94-0.95),AUC为0.97(95%CI,0.96-0.99) 。 Covid-19患者的AI可用于识别肺部受累的症状。由于可能的选择偏差和目前可用研究的可能性,需要更多预期实时试验来确认AI对高速和快速CoVID-19诊断的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号