首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Management and Business Economics >Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria
【24h】

Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria

机译:机会,工作压力和偏差工作场所行为:中和会调解关系吗? 尼日利亚公立大学教师研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to examine the direct effect of the dimensions of opportunity (i.e. ethical climate and institutional policy) and dimensions of job pressure (i.e. workload and work pressure) on workplace deviance (i.e. organisational and interpersonal deviance) and (2) to assess the mediation of neutralisation in the relationship between the dimensions of opportunity, job pressure and workplace deviance. Design/methodology/approach The present study drew from the fraud triangle theory (FTT; Cressey, 1950) and the theory of neutralisation (Sykes and Matza, 1957) to achieve the research objectives. Survey data from 356 full-time faculty members in Nigerian public universities were collected. Partial least square-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyse the data. Findings The results indicated that opportunity and job pressure significantly affected workplace deviance. As expected, neutralisation was found to mediate the negative relationship between ethical climate and interpersonal deviance and the positive relationship between workload, work pressure and interpersonal deviance. Contrary to expectation, neutralisation did not mediate the relationship between opportunity, pressure and organisational deviance. Research limitations/implications The sample was drawn from academics in public universities and the cross-sectional nature of this study means that the findings have limited generalisations. Practical implications This study offers insights into the management of Nigerian public universities on the need to curb workplace deviance amongst faculty members. This study recommends that the management improve the work environment by enhancing the ethical climate and institutional policies and reviewing the existing workload that may constitute pressure to the faculty members. Originality/value The present study provides empirical support for the fraud triangle theory and theory of neutralisation to explain workplace deviance.
机译:目的本研究的目的是双重的:(1)检查机会维度(即道德气候和机构政策)的直接效应(即工作压力(即工作负荷和工作压力)在工作场所偏差(即组织和人际偏差)和(2)评估机会维度与工作场所偏差之间的关系中和中和的中和。设计/方法/方法本研究从欺诈三角理论(FTT; Cressey,1950)和中和理论(Sykes和Matza,1957)中实现了研究目标。收集了来自尼日利亚公立大学的356名全职教师成员的调查数据。采用部分最小二乘结构方程建模(PLS-SEM)来分析数据。结果表明,机会和工作压力显着影响了工作场所偏差。正如预期的那样,发现中和介绍道德气候和人际偏差之间的负面关系,工作量,工作压力和人际偏差之间的正关系。与期望相反,中和没有介入机会,压力和组织偏差之间的关系。研究限制/影响示例从公共大学的学者中汲取,本研究的横截面性质意味着调查结果有限。实践意义本研究为尼日利亚公共大学的管理层提供了对教师之间遏制工作场所偏差的必要性的洞察力。本研究建议管理通过加强道德气候和机构政策,并审查可能构成教师员工压力的现有工作量来改善工作环境。本研究为欺诈三角理论和中和理论提供了对欺诈三角理论的实证支持,以解释工作场所偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号