首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >The Primary Management Strategies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Sub-Study of the Saudi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry
【24h】

The Primary Management Strategies for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Sub-Study of the Saudi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

机译:沙特阿拉伯ST升高心肌梗死患者的主要管理策略:沙特急性心肌梗死登记处的副研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and objective Not all patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Saudi Arabia are managed with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We analyzed the management strategies for STEMI patients in the Saudi Acute Myocardial Infarction?Registry?(STARS). The strategies include PPCI, revascularization with thrombolytic?therapy, and conservative management. This study involved a sub-study of the STARS. Methods STEMI patients were categorized into three groups. Group 1 was managed with PPCI, group 2 with revascularization with thrombolytic therapy, and group 3 with conservative approaches. The data were collected at presentation, at one month, and at one year after discharge. Results The sample?consisted of 1,471 patients. The mean age of the participants was 54 ±12 years; 51%?were Saudi citizens, and the majority (89%) were male. Their background revealed a high coronary risk profile, with 48% diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) and 44% with hypertension (HTN); 54% were active or ex-smokers, 30% had a high lipid profile, and 74% were overweight. PPCI was performed in 42%, and 29% were managed with revascularization using thrombolytic therapy. A conservative approach was followed in 29% of the patients. Patients who had a stroke were treated conservatively due to the risk of bleeding. The patients in group 1 were mostly hypertensive with recurrent angina and a history of prior revascularization, with PPCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The crude all-cause mortality at one year was 11%; it was 7% at one month for group 1, 8% for group 2, and 9% for group 3, which was not statistically significant. Conclusions Controlling the risk factors and improving access to PPCI in hospitals are fundamental in the management of STEMI patients. PPCI is still underused. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is a reasonable approach if PPCI is not available.
机译:背景技术并非所有患有沙特阿拉伯的ST升高心肌梗死患者(STEMI)与主要经皮冠状动脉干预(PPCI)进行管理。我们分析了沙特急性心肌梗死中STEMI患者的管理策略?注册表?(星星)。该策略包括PPCI,具有血栓溶解的血运重建,治疗和保守管理。这项研究涉及星星的次级研究。方法将STEMI患者分为三组。第1组用PPCI,第2组,血运重建与血栓染色治疗,第3组,保守方法。该数据在介绍,一个月内,在出院后一年收集。结果样品?包括1,471名患者。参与者的平均年龄为54±12年; 51%?沙特公民,大多数(89%)是男性。他们的背景揭示了一种高冠状动脉风险概况,48%被诊断患有糖尿病(DM)和44%的高血压(HTN); 54%的活性或出吸烟者,30%具有高脂质型材,74%的超重均持续。 PPCI以42%进行,29%使用血栓疗法进行血运重建进行管理。在29%的患者中遵循保守的方法。由于出血的风险,保守患有中风的患者。第1组患者大多高血压,经常性心绞痛和先前血运重建的历史,PPCI或冠状动脉旁路接枝(CABG)。一年的原油全因死亡率为11%;对于第1组,第2组的第1次,8%的月份为7%,第3组的9%,其在统计学上没有统计学意义。结论控制危险因素和改善医院PPCI的访问是STEMI患者管理的基础。 PPCI仍未被用尽。指导指导的医疗治疗(GDMT)是一种合理的方法,如果PPCI不可用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号