...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Is Emergency Appendicectomy Better Than Elective Appendicectomy for the Treatment of Appendiceal Phlegmon?: A Review
【24h】

Is Emergency Appendicectomy Better Than Elective Appendicectomy for the Treatment of Appendiceal Phlegmon?: A Review

机译:是急诊阑尾切除术比选择性阑尾切除术治疗阑尾痰多吗?:审查

获取原文

摘要

Appendiceal phlegmon is?considered to be sequelae to acute appendicitis which presents as an appendiceal mass composed of the inflamed appendix, the adjacent bowel loops, and the greater omentum. The definitive diagnosis can be obtained by a CT scan of the abdomen. Though conservative management was the most practiced approach, recent studies have shifted the trends towards immediate appendicectomy for the management of appendiceal phlegmon. Thus, the management of appendiceal phlegmon has been debatable.?Evidence to support this review was gathered via the PubMed database as this database uses the Medline, PubMed Central, and NLM databases and also offers a quick diverse search with up-to-date citations and numerous open-access free articles focused on Medicine. We did not include other databases like Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus due to its limited access to free articles, recent articles,?and citation information. Search terms used were combinations of "Appendicitis," "Appendiceal phlegmon", "Appendiceal phlegmon (AND) appendicectomy ". The resultant studies?were reviewed and cross‐referenced for additional reports.?Emergency appendicectomy is defined as appendicectomy carried out during the same, initial admission. An elective or interval appendicectomy is an appendicectomy carried out four to six weeks after the initial episode at a later admission. The interval is bridged by antibiotics and conservative management. Emergency appendicectomy is considered to have a higher rate of complications when compared to conservative management for appendiceal phlegmon. However, interval appendicectomy requires multiple re-admissions, leads to delayed diagnosis of any underlying pathology, and an increased risk of recurrent appendicitis.?In our review, we aimed to compare and contrast the effectiveness of the different treatment modalities available for appendiceal phlegmon. Though the meta-analyses showed an increased association of complications with emergency appendicectomy, they included studies conducted before the laparoscopic era. Emergency appendicectomy decreases the financial burden, re-admission rate, and aids in the early diagnosis of any underlying pathology. In the laparoscopic era, we can consider the shifting trends towards emergency appendicectomy for the management of appendiceal phlegmon.
机译:阑尾痰?被认为是急性阑尾炎的后遗症,其作为由发炎的附录,相邻的肠环和更大的Omentum组成的阑尾质量。可通过腹部的CT扫描获得确定的诊断。虽然保守管理是最实践的方法,但最近的研究已经改变了对阑尾综合切除术的趋势。因此,Phendiceal Phlegmon的管理已经是辩论的。有关支持此审查,通过PubMed数据库收集了此审查,因为此数据库使用Medline,PubMed Central和NLM数据库,并且还提供了快速多样化的搜索,并提供最新的引用和众多开放式免费文章专注于医学。由于访问免费文章,最近的文章,以及引文信息,我们不包括谷歌学者,EMBASE和SCOPUS等其他数据库。所使用的搜索条件是“阑尾炎”的组合“阑尾综合症”,“阑尾痰(和)阑尾切除术”。所得的研究?进行审查和交叉参考另外一份报告。治疗药物阑尾切除术被定义为在同一期间进行的阑尾切除术。选修或间隔阑尾切除术是在后续入院后初始发作后四到六周进行的阑尾切除术。该间隔由抗生素和保守管理桥接。与对阑尾综合征的保守管理相比,急诊阑尾切除术被认为具有更高的并发症率。然而,间隔阑尾切除术需要多次重新入学,导致延迟诊断任何潜在的病理学,以及复发性阑尾炎的风险增加。我们的审查,我们旨在比较和对比分类综合症可用于阑尾综合症的有效性。虽然Meta分析表明,随着紧急阑尾切除术,它们的并发症伴有增加,但它们包括在腹腔镜时代之前进行的研究。紧急阑尾切除术减少了在早期诊断任何潜在病理学的情况下的财务负担,再入率和艾滋病。在腹腔镜时代,我们可以考虑对治疗阑尾综合切除术的转移趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号