首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Human decision-making biases in the moral dilemmas of autonomous vehicles
【24h】

Human decision-making biases in the moral dilemmas of autonomous vehicles

机译:自治车辆道德困境中的人为决策偏见

获取原文
       

摘要

The development of artificial intelligence has led researchers to study the ethical principles that should guide machine behavior. The challenge in building machine morality based on people's moral decisions, however, is accounting for the biases in human moral decision-making. In seven studies, this paper investigates how people's personal perspectives and decision-making modes affect their decisions in the moral dilemmas faced by autonomous vehicles. Moreover, it determines the variations in people's moral decisions that can be attributed to the situational factors of the dilemmas. The reported studies demonstrate that people's moral decisions, regardless of the presented dilemma, are biased by their decision-making mode and personal perspective. Under intuitive moral decisions, participants shift more towards a deontological doctrine by sacrificing the passenger instead of the pedestrian. In addition, once the personal perspective is?made salient participants preserve the lives of that perspective, i.e. the passenger shifts towards sacrificing the pedestrian, and vice versa. These biases in people's moral decisions underline the social challenge in the design of a universal moral code for autonomous vehicles. We discuss the implications of our findings and provide directions for future research.
机译:人工智能的发展引领了研究人员研究应该引导机器行为的道德原则。然而,根据人们的道德决策建立机器道德的挑战正在占人道德决策的偏见。在七项研究中,本文调查了人们的个人观点和决策模式如何影响自主车辆面临的道德困境中的决策。此外,它决定了人们道德决策的变化,这些决定可以归因于困境的情境因素。报告的研究表明,人们的道德决策无论呈现的困境,因其决策模式和个人观点而偏见。在直观的道德决策下,参与者通过牺牲乘客而不是行人来改变外国学说。此外,一旦个人观点是?发出突出的参与者,保留了这种观点的生命,即乘客转向牺牲行人,反之亦然。这些偏见人们的道德决策强调了自主车辆普遍道德规范的社会挑战。我们讨论了我们的调查结果的影响,并为未来的研究提供了指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号