首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort, and Acceptance during the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Intermaxillary Traction Versus the Removable Mandibular Retractor: A Randomised Controlled Trial
【24h】

Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort, and Acceptance during the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Bone-Anchored Intermaxillary Traction Versus the Removable Mandibular Retractor: A Randomised Controlled Trial

机译:使用骨锚定术牵引与可拆卸下颌牵发光剂的骨锚定术治疗III型咬合术后疼痛,不适和验收的评估:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Bone-Anchored Intermaxillary Traction (BAIMT) is a relatively new method for class III treatment in growing patients, therefore evidence about their acceptability as well as the levels of pain, discomfort and functional impairments among orthodontic patients is still lacking.Aim: To evaluate levels of pain, discomfort and acceptance between the BAIMT system and a commonly used treatment modality in the correction of Class III malocclusion.Materials and Methods: Two-arm parallel-group randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Al-Baath University Dental School between Febuary and October 2015. Fifty-six patients who met the inclusion criteria were distributed randomly and equally into two groups: the bone-anchored intermaxillary traction group (the BAIMT group with a mean age of 11.3 years) and the removable mandibular retractor group (the RMR group with a mean age of 11.5 years). A special questionnaire (originally designed by Sergl) was used and included six questions regarding patientsa?? feelings of appliance-related tension/pressure, pain, impaired speech, swallowing difficulty, oral constraint and lack of confidence in public. This questionnaire was administered at T1 (1 day), T2 (1 week), T3 (6 weeks), T4 (3 months) and T5 (6 months) following appliance initial wear.Results: Fifty-one patients were included in the analysis (BAIMT group: 26; RMR group: 25). Patients treated with the BAIMT system had higher levels of pressure, tension (p<0.001) and pain (p<0.001) compared to those in the control group. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to impaired swallowing, whereas the RMR caused more constraint in mandibular movements (p<0.05) and more speech impairment (p<0.001) in addition to increased levels of lack of confidence (p<0.001).Conclusion: The BAIMT system caused more pain than the RMR but the levels of pain gradually decreased especially after one week following application. RMR caused more mandibular restriction and more speech impairment because of the presence of the reverse bow, and it caused relatively high levels of social avoidance and lack of confidence for the patient.
机译:骨锚定的跨型牵引(Baimt)是一种相对较新的方法,用于生长患者中的III类治疗方法,因此仍然缺乏牙齿性患者的可接受性以及疼痛,不适和功能障碍水平的证据。目的:评估Baimt系统之间的疼痛,不适和验收水平和常用的治疗方式在校正III级杂种中。材料和方法:双臂平行组随机对照试验在矫正科部进行,2015年12月和10月之间的Al-Baath大学牙科学校。符合纳入标准的五十六名患者随机分为两组:骨锚定的跨型牵引群(Baimt集团,平均年龄为11.3岁)可拆卸下颌牵发光器组(RMR组,平均年龄为11.5岁)。使用了一个特殊的调查问卷(最初由Sergl),并包括六个关于患者的问题?有关家电相关的张力/压力,痛苦,言论,吞咽困难,吞咽困难,口头限制和公共信心缺乏信心。在家电初始磨损术后T1(1天),T2(1周),T3(6周),T4(3个月)和T5(6个月),T4(3个月)和T5(6个月)施用该问卷。结果:包括五十一名患者在分析(Baimt组:26; RMR组:25)。与对照组中的相比,用Baimt系统治疗的患者的压力,张力(P <0.001)和疼痛(P <0.001)。两组之间没有危险地发现危险损害,而RMR在下颌运动中引起更多约束(P <0.05),除了增加信心水平的增加之外,还有更多的语音损伤(P <0.001)(P <0.001) <0.001)。结论:Baimt系统引起比RMR更多的疼痛,但疼痛水平逐渐降低,特别是在申请后一周后逐渐降低。 RMR由于存在反向弓而导致更多的下颌限制和更多的语音障碍,并且它导致了相对较高的社会避免和对患者缺乏信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号