...
首页> 外文期刊>MATEC Web of Conferences >Comparative study of four consolidation settlement estimation methods of a railway embankment
【24h】

Comparative study of four consolidation settlement estimation methods of a railway embankment

机译:铁路路堤四个整合沉降估计方法的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Embankment is one of the oldest and most common constructions of public works due to its low cost, simplicity and good performance. This is why it is often required for economic reasons even if underlying soil is of poor quality. Meanwhile, this is not without risk, since we notice sometimes significant damages such as intolerable settlements, landslides and erosion. These risks are particularly dangerous in the case of railways where tolerances are mainly severe. In this work we propose a comparative study of four theoretical methods for estimating the consolidation settlement of a railway embankment. These methods are Terzaghi (1925), Asaoka (1978), Tan (1995) and Chunlin (2014). We applied each method to estimate the final settlement of the 15m high embankment at PK245+000 of the railway under construction Boughezoul-M’sila (Algeria).
机译:由于其成本低,简单性和良好的性能,堤防是公共工程的最古老,最常见的建筑之一。这就是为什么它通常需要经济原因,即使底层土壤质量差。同时,这不是没有风险的,因为我们注意到有时诸如无法忍受的沉淀,滑坡和侵蚀之类的重大损害。在铁路主要严重的情况下,这些风险特别危险。在这项工作中,我们提出了四种理论方法的比较研究,用于估算铁路路堤的整合解决。这些方法是Terzaghi(1925),Asaoka(1978),Tan(1995)和Chunlin(2014年)。我们应用了每种方法来估计建筑Boughezoul-M'sila(阿尔及利亚)下铁路PK245 + 000的15米高堤的最终结算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号