...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Candida colonization as a predictor of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic ICU patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Candida colonization as a predictor of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic ICU patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:Candida殖民化作为败血症非中性ICU患者的侵入性念珠菌病的预测因子:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background Candida colonization is a risk factor for the development of invasive candidiasis. This study sought to estimate the magnitude of this association, and determine if this information can be used to guide empirical antifungal therapy initiation in critically ill septic patients. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically reviewed for all published studies evaluating predictors of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients with sepsis. Meta-analysis was used to determine the pooled odds ratio for invasive candidiasis among colonized versus non-colonized patients. Sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios ( LR, ―LR) were then calculated by considering the presence/absence of Candida colonization as the diagnostic test, and the presence/absence of invasive candidiasis as the disease of interest. Results Out of 9825 patients in the 10 eligible studies, 3886 (40%) were colonized with Candida and 462 patients (4.7%) developed invasive candidiasis. Meta-analysis indicated that critically ill patients with sepsis who are colonized with candida are more likely to develop invasive candidiasis (odds ratio 3.32; 95% CI 1.68–6.58) compared with non-colonized patients. The pooled SN was 75.2% (95% CI 59.6–86.2%), while the pooled SP was 49.2% (95% CI 33.2–65.3%).The NPV of Candida colonization was high (96.9%; 95% CI 92.0–98.9%), but the PPV was low (9.1%; 95% CI 5.5–14.6%). Conclusion Candida colonization is strongly associated with the likelihood of invasive candidiasis among ICU patients with sepsis. Available data argue against initiating empirical antifungal treatment in non-neutropenic septic patients without prior documented Candida colonization.
机译:背景技术念珠菌殖民是侵入性念珠菌病的危险因素。该研究寻求估计该关联的大小,并确定该信息是否可用于指导批评性化脓性患者的经验抗真菌治疗开始。方法对所有已发表的研究进行系统地审查了PubMed / Medline和Embase,评估ICU患者肠溶症患者侵入性念珠菌病的预测因子。 Meta分析用于确定殖民化与非殖民化患者的侵袭性念珠菌病的合并的含量比。敏感性(SN),特异性(SP),正面和阴性预测值(PPV,NPV)和正和负似然比(LR,-LR)通过考虑念珠菌殖民化作为诊断测试,和侵入性念珠菌病的存在/不存在作为感兴趣的疾病。结果在10项合格研究中的9825名患者中,3886名(40%)与念珠菌和462名患者(4.7%)发育侵入性念珠菌病。荟萃分析表明,与非殖民化患者相比,患有念珠菌的患者与念珠菌殖民殖民的患者更容易发生侵袭性念珠菌病(赔率比3.32; 95%CI 1.68-6.58)。汇集的Sn为75.2%(95%CI 59.6-86.2%),汇集的SP为49.2%(95%CI 33.2-65.3%)。念珠菌殖民化的NPV高(96.9%; 95%CI 92.0-98.9 %),但PPV低(9.1%; 95%CI 5.5-14.6%)。结论念珠菌殖民化与败血症患者侵袭性念珠菌病的可能性强烈有关。可用数据反对未经证明的念珠菌定植的非中性化脓性患者在非中性化脓性患者中发起经验抗真菌治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号