首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Transillumination of Calot’s Triangle on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Feasible Approach to Achieve a Critical View of Safety
【24h】

Transillumination of Calot’s Triangle on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Feasible Approach to Achieve a Critical View of Safety

机译:征管腹腔镜胆囊切除术的征集三角形的过敏:一种实现安全性批判性观点的可行方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently one of the most commonly performed procedures?globally.?Morbidity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is low; however, bile duct injury is still a feared complication. Despite worldwide efforts, the global incidence of bile duct injury remains higher for laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open cholecystectomy. Despite the general belief that the learning curve and lack of laparoscopic skills represent the most common causes of bile duct injuries, the principal cause is the misidentification of biliary anatomy. The aim of our study is to determine if laparoscopic transillumination is a feasible approach to bile and vascular structures visualization during laparoscopic cholecystectomy because the only other method for real-time visualization is fluorescent cholangiography, which can be cost-prohibitive and requires specialized equipment and training. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective comparison of outcomes between the transillumination approach in 10 patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy (group A) and a control group of 50 conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients (group B). We compared demographic data, type of surgery, operative time, bleeding, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and hospital stay. We used a conventional four-port positioning for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and a 5-mm/30° scope was used as a light source and placed behind the area identified as Calot’s triangle. Results Group A consisted of 10 patients (9 women, 1 man), with a mean age of 50.7 (± 17.4) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) in group A was 26.8?(± 0.65) kg/msup2/sup. In group A, three of the cholecystectomies were conducted as emergency procedures. Group B consisted of 50 patients (40 women, 10 men), with a mean age of 49.7 (±15.2) years. The mean BMI in group B was 27.5?(±4.5) kg/msup2/sup, and two cholecystectomies were emergency procedures. In comparing the transillumination approach with conventional cholecystectomy, we found no statistical differences in operative time, bleeding, complications, or mean hospital stay. Conclusions Laparoscopic transillumination is a feasible method for real-time visualization of Calot’s triangle structures. Our initial experience with transillumination did not provide better outcomes than conventional cholecystectomy.
机译:背景技术腹腔镜胆囊切除术是目前最常见的程序之一?全球性的腹腔镜胆囊切除术的发病率低;然而,胆管损伤仍然是一种令人担忧的并发症。尽管全球努力,与腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,胆汁管损伤的全球发病率仍然更高,与开放的胆囊切除术相比。尽管普遍认为,学习曲线和腹腔镜技能缺乏含有胆管损伤的最常见原因,但主要原因是胆道解剖学的误识别。我们的研究目的是确定腹腔镜过敏是否是腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间胆汁和血管结构可视化的可行方法,因为实时可视化的唯一其他方法是荧光胆管造影,这可能是成本普及,需要专业的设备和培训。材料和方法我们在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术(A组)的10例患者中的递减症方法与50例常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者(B组)的对照组进行了回顾性比较。我们比较了人口统计数据,手术类型,手术时间,出血,术中和术后并发症以及住院住宿。我们使用了腹腔镜胆囊切除术的传统四端口定位,使用5毫米/ 30°的范围作为光源,并放置在被确定为CALOT三角形的区域后面。结果组A由10名患者(9名女性,1名男子)组成,平均年龄为50.7(±17.4)岁。 A组中的平均体质量指数(BMI)为26.8?(±0.65)kg / m 2 。在A组中,三种胆囊切除术被作为应急程序进行。 B组由50名患者(40名女性,10名男性)组成,平均年龄为49.7(±15.2)岁。 B组的平均BMI为27.5?(±4.5)kg / m 2 ,两种胆囊切除术是紧急程序。在比较常规胆囊切除术中的透明度方法时,我们发现手术时间,出血,并发症或平均住院的统计差异没有统计学差异。结论腹腔镜过敏是一种可行的方法,用于征集三角形结构的实时可视化。我们对多颌骨的初始经验没有提供比常规胆囊切除术的更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号