首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >How resource limitations and household economics may?compromise efforts to safeguard children during outbreaks
【24h】

How resource limitations and household economics may?compromise efforts to safeguard children during outbreaks

机译:资源限制和家庭经济可能如何?妥协在爆发期间保护儿童的努力

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Epidemiological models have been employed with great success to explore the efficacy of alternativestrategies at combating disease outbreaks. These models have often incorporated an understanding of age-basedsusceptibility and severity of outcome, considering how to limit the adverse outcomes or disease burden relative toan age structure. Such models frequently recommend the preferential treatment/vaccination of children orthe elderly, demonstrating how prevention of serious disease within these etiological subgroups can provide bothprotection within the subgroup itself and indirect protection to the broader population. However, it is mostfrequently the case that these target populations are consumers, rather than providers, of household resources. Inareas of the globe where continued health of household members relies on continued provision of resources, thesemodels may fail to provide the most effective overall strategies for health outcomes in both target populations andoverall. This is particularly important for tropical diseases impacting rural and low-income areas in which the diseasemay be endemic or newly emergent, particularly in the wake of natural disasters.Methods: We propose a modified epidemiological model with targeted treatment in resource-limited populations.We evaluate the model over a broad parameter space.Results: This model demonstrates how economic limitations may shift the optimal strategy. It may beadvantageous to treat populations at lesser direct risk if they are responsible for providing secondary protection tohigher-risk population(s) by producing household resources. Evaluation of this model over the parameter spacereveals that, in some cases, targeting treatment towards consumers may result in greater numbers of consumerinfections.Conclusions: Our results demonstrate how household resource limitation can drastically affect the impact oftargeted treatment strategies for limiting epidemics. Depending on the economic circumstances, it is possible thatfocusing treatment on consumers such as children can produce a counter-intuitive outcome in which morechildren contract the disease.
机译:背景:流行病学模型始终取得了巨大的成功,以探讨交替的患者在打击疾病爆发时的疗效。这些模型经常纳入了基于年龄的年龄的Inceptitibility和成果严重性的理解,考虑到如何限制相对Toan年龄结构的不利结果或疾病负担。这些模型经常推荐儿童或老年人的优惠治疗/疫苗接种,证明如何在这些病因亚组内预防严重疾病,可以在亚组本身内提供两种保护和对更广泛的人口的间接保护。然而,这些目标人群是消费者,而不是提供者,家庭资源的情况最为常。全球允许家庭成员持续依赖于持续提供资源的地球仪,该表达式可能未能为目标人群安德拉尔的卫生成果提供最有效的整体策略。这对于影响农村和低收入地区的热带疾病尤其重要,其中减少人流行或新兴的,特别是在自然灾害之后。方法:我们提出了一种改进的流行病学模型,在资源有限的人群中进行了有针对性的待遇。我们通过广泛的参数空间评估模型。结果:此模型展示了经济限制如何变化最佳策略。如果他们负责通过生产家庭资源,负责为大学保护二次保护,以较低的直接风险对待较小风险的人口。评估该模型在参数空间中,在某些情况下,在某些情况下,针对消费者的靶向治疗可能导致更多的消费素感染。结论:我们的结果表明家庭资源限制如何大大影响限制流行病的影响待遇策略的影响。根据经济环境,可能对儿童等消费者进行拟集的治疗可以产生一个反向直观的结果,其中MoreChildren合同疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号