首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Effect of a participatory organizational workplace intervention on workplace social capital: post-hoc results from a cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Effect of a participatory organizational workplace intervention on workplace social capital: post-hoc results from a cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:参与式组织工作场所干预对工作场所社会资本的影响:集群随机对照试验的HOC结果

获取原文
       

摘要

A high level of workplace social capital (WSC) may contribute to the protection of employees' health. We hypothesized that a participatory workplace intervention would increase the level of WSC defined as vertical WSC (i.e. WSC linking together employees and their leaders) and horizontal WSC (i.e. WSC bonding employees together). We conducted a secondary data analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial that was implemented among all employees in 78 municipal Danish pre-schools (44 intervention and 34 control group schools). The study sample consisted of 606 employees, 386 in the intervention and 220 in the control group. The intervention aimed to improve the psychosocial working environment by using a participatory approach and focusing on core job tasks. Vertical and horizontal WSC was measured by five and four items, respectively, at baseline and at 24-months follow-up. We estimated intervention effect by calculating the interaction of change over time by group assignment (intervention versus control group) and included workplace identification number in a repeated statement to take into account that employees were nested within workplaces. We conducted post-hoc analyses to examine whether intervention effect differed by implementation degree. WSC decreased in both groups. In the main analyses, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention and control group, neither for vertical nor horizontal WSC. However, when we excluded intervention workplaces with a low degree of implementation, we found a statistically significant difference between the intervention and the control group (estimate: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.50, p?=?0.049), indicating that vertical WSC decreased in the control group and remained stable in the intervention group. There was not a statistically significant difference between intervention and control group in the main analysis. Post-hoc analyses, however, suggest that the intervention may have prevented a decrease in vertical WSC among employees in workplaces with a high or a medium degree of implementation. A conference abstract with the key results of this study has been previously presented and published, European Journal of Public Health, Volume 28, Issue suppl_4, November 2018, cky260, https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/28/suppl_4/cky260/5187184 . ISRCTN16271504 , retrospectively registered on November 15, 2016.
机译:高水平的工作场所社会资本(WSC)可能有助于保护员工的健康状况。我们假设参与式工作场所干预将增加WSC的水平,定义为垂直WSC(即WSC将员工及其领导者联系在一起)和水平WSC(即WSC绑定员工在一起)。我们对集群随机对照试验进行了次要数据分析,该试验是在78个市丹麦学前的所有员工中实施(44个干预和34所对照组学校)。研究样本由606名员工,386人在控制组中,220名。通过使用参与式方法并关注核心工作任务,旨在改善心理社会工作环境的干预。垂直和水平WSC分别在基线和24个月后测量五个和四项。我们通过组分配计算随时间的变化的相互作用(干预与对照组)进行估计干预效果,并在重复的陈述中包含了工作场所识别号码,以考虑到员工在工作场所内嵌套。我们进行后HOC分析,以检查干预效果是否有所不同的实施程度。 WSC两组减少。在主要分析中,干预和对照组之间没有统计学意义的差异,既不是垂直也不是水平的WSC。但是,当我们排除具有低的实施程度低的干预工作场所时,我们发现干预和对照组之间的统计学显着差异(估计:0.25,95%Ci:0.00至0.50,P?= 0.049),表明垂直WSC减少在对照组中,干预组保持稳定。干预和对照组在主要分析中没有统计学意义。然而,后HOC分析表明,干预可能已经阻止了具有高或中等程度的工作场所的员工中的垂直WSC减少。一项与本研究的关键结果的会议摘要已经出版并出版,欧洲公共卫生,第28卷,第2018年11月,CKY260,HTTPS://CADEMER.OUP.COM/eurpub/Article/28/ SUPPL_4 / CKY260 / 5187184。 ISRCTN16271504,回顾性于2016年11月15日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号