首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study

机译:验证Fitbit Zip用于监测学校儿童的身体活动:横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Modern activity trackers, including the Fitbit Zip, enable the measurement of both the step count as well as physical activity (PA) intensities. However, there is a need for field-based validation studies in a variety of populations before using trackers for research. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the validity of Fitbit Zip step count, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary minutes, in different school segments in 3rd grade students. Third grade students (N?=?147, aged 9-10?years) wore a Fitbit Zip and an ActiGraph GT3x-BT accelerometer simultaneously on a belt for five days during school hours. The number of steps, minutes of MVPA and sedentary time during class time, physical education lessons and recess were extracted from both devices using time filters, based on the information from school time tables obtained from class teachers. The validity of the Fitbit Zip in different school segments was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and Spearman's correlation. There was a strong correlation in the number of steps in all in-school segments between the two devices (r?=?0.85-0.96, P??0.001). The Fitbit Zip overestimated the number of steps in all segments, with the greatest overestimation being present in physical education lessons (345 steps). As for PA intensities, the agreement between the two devices in physical education and recess was moderate for MVPA minutes (r?=?0.56 and r?=?0.72, P??0.001, respectively) and strong for sedentary time (r?=?0.85 and r?=?0.87, P??0.001, respectively). During class time, the correlation was weak for MVPA minutes (r?=?0.24, P??0.001) and moderate for sedentary time (r?=?0.57, P??0.001). For total in-school time, the correlation between the two devices was strong for steps (r?=?0.98, P??0.001), MVPA (r?=?0.80, P??0.001) and sedentary time (r?=?0.94, P??0.001). In general, the Fitbit Zip can be considered a relatively accurate device for measuring the number of steps, MVPA and sedentary time in students in a school-setting. However, in segments where sedentary time dominates (e.g. academic classes), a research-grade accelerometer should be preferred.
机译:现代活动跟踪器,包括Fitbit Zip,使得步骤计数以及物理活动(PA)强度的测量。然而,在使用跟踪器进行研究之前,需要在各种群体中进行基于现场的验证研究。因此,目前研究的目的是探讨Fitbit Zip步长计数的有效性,中度至剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)和久坐少数次,在3年级学生的不同学校段中。三年级学生(n?=?147,年龄9-10岁?年龄)在上课时间在皮带上同时穿着Fitbit Zip和Aptigraph GT3X-BT加速度计。基于从类教师获得的学校时间表的信息,从两个设备中提取了从两种设备中提取了课程时间内的步数,MVPA和久坐时间的步数,数分钟,体育课程和休息时间。使用Bland-Altman分析和Spearman的相关性评估了不同院校段中Fitbit Zip的有效性。两种设备之间的所有校内段中的步骤数量有很强的相关性(R?= 0.85-0.96,P?<0.001)。 Fitbit Zip高估了所有段中的步骤数,具有最大的高度高估在体育教育课程中(345步)。至于PA强度,体育和休息中的两个设备之间的协议适用于MVPA分钟(R?= 0.56和R?= 0.72,P?0.001分别用于久坐时间(R? =?0.85和r?=?0.87,p?<Δ0.001)。在阶段时间内,MVPA分钟的相关性弱(R?= 0.24,p≤0.24,p≤0.<〜0.001)和适度用于久坐时间(R?= 0.57,P?<0.001)。在学校总时间,两种器件之间的相关性对于步骤(R?=?0.98,P≤0.98),MVPA(r?=Δ0.80,p?<0.001)和久坐时间(r ?=?0.94,p?<0.001)。通常,FitBit Zip可以被认为是一种相对准确的装置,用于测量学校设定中学生中的步骤,MVPA和久坐时间的相对准确的装置。但是,在久坐时间占主导地位(例如学术课程)的段中,应首选研究级加速度计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号