...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Fertility-sparing surgery and oncologic outcome among patients with early-stage ovarian cancer ~propensity score- matched analysis~
【24h】

Fertility-sparing surgery and oncologic outcome among patients with early-stage ovarian cancer ~propensity score- matched analysis~

机译:早期卵巢癌患者患者的生育疏忽手术和肿瘤结果〜倾向分数匹配分析〜

获取原文

摘要

BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to investigate how much the risks of recurrence and death are increased as a consequence of selecting fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).METHODS:After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from 14 collaborating hospitals, a non-randomized, observational cohort study was conducted between 1987 and 2015, including 1183 women with stage I EOC. Finally, a total of 285 patients with stage I EOC at reproductive age were recruited. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the FSS (N?=?101) and radical surgery (RS) group (N?=?184) using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique to adjust for relevant risk factors: the age, substage, histological type, grade, CA125 values, ascites cytology, ascites volume, and chemotherapy.RESULTS:During 66.0?months (median) of follow-up, 42 patients (14.7%) developed recurrence, and 31 patients (10.9%) died. In the original cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the FSS and RS groups {Log-rank: OS (P?=?0.838), RFS (P?=?0.377)}. In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in RFS or OS between the FSS and RS groups {RFS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.262 (95% CI: 0.559-2.852), P?=?0. 575; OS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.206 (95% CI: 0.460-3.163), P?=?0.704}.CONCLUSIONS:After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, FSS in itself may not worsen the oncologic outcome in young women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是调查复发和死亡的风险因选择上皮卵巢癌(EOC)的少妇中的生育备件手术(FSS)而增加.Methods:在中央病理审查后并在1987年至2015年间,在1987年至2015年间,在14家合作医院的医疗记录中搜索了一个非随机的观察队列研究,其中包括1183名舞台上的妇女。最后,招募了共有285例患有生殖年龄的阶段阶段的患者。在FSS(N?= 101)和自由基手术(RS)组(N?= 184)之间比较肿瘤结果,使用倾向得分(PS) - 拟合技术来调整相关风险因素:年龄,等级,组织学类型,等级,Ca125值,腹水细胞学,腹水体积和化疗。结果:在66.0?月(中位数)的随访期间,42名患者(14.7%)发育复发,31例患者(10.9%)死亡。在原始队列中,FSS和RS组之间的整体存活(OS)或复发的存活(RFS)没有显着差异{log-ange:OS(p?= 0.838),RFS(p?=? 0.377)}。在调整多个临床病理因素后的PS匹配的队列中,FSS和RS组之间的RFS或OS没有显着差异{RFS(FSS与RS),HR:1.262(95%CI:0.559-2.852), p?=?0。 575; OS(FSS与RS),HR:1.206(95%CI:0.460-3.163),p?=?0.704} .Conclusions:调整临床病理因素后,FSS本身可能不会让早期的年轻女性的肿瘤结果恶化-Stage eoc。需要大规模的临床研究来验证调查结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号