首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
【24h】

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

机译:Neoadjuvant化疗随后是同时的化学疗法与同时进行化学疗法,然后在局部晚期鼻咽癌中进行辅助化疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT-AC) is currently recommended as the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NAC-CCRT) is an alternative strategy for decreasing tumor size and controlling micrometastases before main treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare survival outcomes between LA-NPC patients treated with CCRT-AC and those treated with NAC-CCRT. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive histologically confirmed LA-NPC patients that were treated with NAC-CCRT or CCRT-AC at Siriraj Hospital during the March 2010 to October 2014 study period. CCRT in both protocols consisted of 3-week?cycles of cisplatin 100?mg/m2 with concurrent radiotherapy. Either NAC or AC consisted of 3-week?cycles of cisplatin on day 1 and fluorouracil/leucovorin on days 1–4 for a maximum three cycles. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). Flexible parametric survival analysis was used, because the proportional hazards assumption of Cox regression was violated. Of the 266 LA-NPC patients that received treatment during the study period, 79 received NAC-CCRT and 187 received CCRT-AC. Median follow-up was 37?months. Significantly more patients with advanced clinical stage (stage IVA-IVB) received NAC-CCRT (86% in NAC-CCRT vs. 29% in CCRT-AC; p?
机译:随后是佐剂化疗(CCRT-AC)的同时化学疗法目前推荐作为局部晚期鼻咽癌(LA-NPC)的标准治疗。 Neoadjuvant化疗随后是同时的化学疗法(NAC-CCRT)是用于降低肿瘤大小和控制主要处理前的微量酶的替代策略。本研究的目的是调查和比较用CCRT-AC治疗的LA-NPC患者与NAC-CCRT处理的患者之间的存活结果。该回顾性队列研究包括连续组织学证实的LA-NPC患者,在2010年3月至2014年10月的研究期间,在Siriraj医院用NAC-CCRT或CCRT-AC治疗。两种协议中的CCRT由3周组成?顺铂100℃的循环100?Mg / m 2,并发放射疗法。 NAC或AC由3周组成,第1天和氟尿嘧啶的顺铂循环,第1-4天1-4,最大三个循环。主要终点是5年的总体存活(OS)。使用柔性参数存活分析,因为侵犯了Cox回归的比例危害。在研究期间接受治疗的266名La-NPC患者中,79名接受NAC-CCRT和187次获得CCRT-AC。中位后续时间为37?几个月。更大的临床阶段患者(阶段IVA-IVB)接受NAC-CCRT(NAC-CCRT的86%,CCRT-AC的29%; P?<0.001)。与CCRT-AC相比,NAC-CCRT的3年和5年的OS分别为72%,分别为86%和62%(P?= 0.059)。有趣的是,3年和5年的估算后调整后OS为NAC-CCRT的84%和74%,CCRT-AC分别为81%和70%(HR:0.83,95%置信区间(CI): 0.45-1.56; p?= 0.571)。此外,调整后转移存活的分析,NAC-CCRT显示HR为0.79(95%CI:0.37-1.72,P?= 0.557)。相反,调整后的对招拷贝(LLR)的分析 - 免费存活显示NAC-CCRT的LRR风险显着更高(HR:2.18,95%CI:0.98-4.87; P?= 0.057)。结果表明,NAC-CCRT治疗患者的预后不优于CCRT-AC处理的个体。在接受Neoadjuvant化疗的患者中,招待复发应该是值得关注的。从NAC-CCR达到生存优势的高风险远处转移患者(N3阶段)是进一步研究的有趣和重要的话题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号