首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science >Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study
【24h】

Factors Affecting Smile Attractiveness: An Eye Tracking Study

机译:影响微笑吸引力的因素:眼新的研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the buccal corridor width, gingival display, and upper midline deviation on smile aesthetics. Methods: A frontal posed smile photograph (reference photograph) of a young female was rearranged using digital imaging software to produce artificially created photographs that exhibited different buccal corridor widths, midline deviations, and gingival displays. A total of 21 images were obtained with reference photograph. While an eye tracking device was recording, each image was evaluated and assigned aesthetic scores by 16 laypeople (8 males, 8 female). A total of 336 laypeople participated in the study. A 5-point Likert scale was used for scoring. One-way ANOVA, Welch's T-test, Tukey’s HSD test, and Tamhane's T2 test were used for statistical analysis. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The highest and lowest scores were assigned to 2- and 8-mm buccal corridor widths, respectively. Gingival displays of +2 and above, and +5 mm and above were scored significantly lower than the reference image (p0.05) by female and male participants, respectively. There was a significant difference in 6-mm gingival display for males (p0.05). Conclusions: The different buccal corridor widths yielded no significant difference in attractiveness scores or focusing times for either gender. In the midline evaluation, even a deviation of 6 mm was not noticed by laypeople and was not found to be less attractive.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估口腔走廊宽度,牙龈展示和上线偏差对微笑美学的影响。方法:使用数字成像软件重新排列一张年轻女性的正面构成的微笑照片(参考照片),以生产在人工创造的照片上,这些照片显示出不同的颊道走廊宽度,中线偏差和牙龈显示。通过参考照片获得总共21个图像。在记录眼睛跟踪装置的同时,每张图像评估并分配16种幼儿(8名男性,8名女性)的美学分数。共有336人参加了这项研究。 5点李克特秤用于得分。单向ANOVA,Welch的T-Test,Tukey的HSD测试和Tamhane的T2测试用于统计分析。 P值小于0.05被认为是统计学意义的。结果:分别分配最高和最低分数到2级和8毫米颊道走廊宽度。 +2及以上的牙龈显示器和+ 5 mm和以上均分别均分别低于女性和男性参与者的参考图像(P <0.05)。男性6毫米牙龈显示屏存在显着差异(P <0.05)。结论:不同的口腔走廊宽度不会产生显着差异,对性别的吸引力分数或聚焦时间。在中线评估中,甚至没有引起6毫米的偏差,并没有发现甚至没有发现甚至没有发现不太吸引人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号