首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical Internet research >Rates of Attrition and Dropout in App-Based Interventions for Chronic Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Rates of Attrition and Dropout in App-Based Interventions for Chronic Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:基于应用的慢性病的应用干预措施的消耗和辍学率:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Chronic disease represents a large and growing burden to the health care system worldwide. One method of managing this burden is the use of app-based interventions; however attrition, defined as lack of patient use of the intervention, is an issue for these interventions. While many apps have been developed, there is some evidence that they have significant issues with sustained use, with up to 98% of people only using the app for a short time before dropping out and/or dropping use down to the point where the app is no longer effective at helping to manage disease. Objective Our objectives are to systematically appraise and perform a meta-analysis on dropout rates in apps for chronic disease and to qualitatively synthesize possible reasons for these dropout rates that could be addressed in future interventions. Methods MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL (Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Embase were searched from 2003 to the present to look at mobile health (mHealth) and attrition or dropout. Studies, either randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational trials, looking at chronic disease with measures of dropout were included. Meta-analysis of attrition rates was conducted in Stata, version 15.1 (StataCorp LLC). Included studies were also qualitatively synthesized to examine reasons for dropout and avenues for future research. Results Of 833 studies identified in the literature search, 17 were included in the review and meta-analysis. Out of 17 studies, 9 (53%) were RCTs and 8 (47%) were observational trials, with both types covering a range of chronic diseases. The pooled dropout rate was 43% (95% CI 29-57), with observational studies having a higher dropout rate (49%, 95% CI 27-70) than RCTs in more controlled scenarios, which only had a 40% dropout rate (95% CI 16-63). The studies were extremely varied, which is represented statistically in the high degree of heterogeneity (I ~(2)&99%). Qualitative synthesis revealed a range of reasons relating to attrition from app-based interventions, including social, demographic, and behavioral factors that could be addressed. Conclusions Dropout rates in mHealth interventions are high, but possible areas to minimize attrition exist. Reducing dropout rates will make these apps more effective for disease management in the long term. Trial Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019128737; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019128737
机译:背景技术慢性疾病代表全球医疗保健系统的大幅增长。管理此负担的一种方法是使用基于应用的干预措施;然而,因缺乏患者使用干预而定义的磨损,是这些干预措施的问题。虽然已经开发了许多应用程序,但有一些证据表明他们有很大的问题,持续使用,只有高达98%的人,只有在短时间内使用该应用程序在辍学和/或下降到应用程序在帮助管理疾病时不再有效。目的,我们的目标是系统地评估并对慢性病应用中的辍学率进行荟萃分析,并定制综合这些辍学率可能在未来干预措施中解决的可能原因。方法中线(医学文献分析和检索系统在线),PubMed,Cochrane Central(中央对照试验)和Embase从2003年搜索到现在,以查看移动健康(MHEALT)和磨损或辍学。包括研究患有辍学措施的慢性疾病的随机对照试验(RCT)或观察试验。在STATA,版本15.1(Statacorp LLC)中进行了磨损率的Meta分析。还包括定性地合成的研究,以研究未来研究的辍学和途径的原因。在文献搜索中确定的833项研究,17次综述和荟萃分析中纳入了833项研究。在17项研究中,9名(53%)是RCT,8(47%)是观察试验,两种类型涵盖一系列慢性疾病。汇总的辍学率为43%(95%CI 29-57),观察性研究比在更受控情景中的RCT率高的辍学率(49%,95%CI 27-70),其辍学率仅有40% (95%CI 16-63)。这些研究非常多变,其在高度的异质性(I〜(2)& 99%)中表示统计学上。定性综合揭示了与基于应用的干预措施有关的一系列原因,包括可以解决的社会,人口和行为因素。结论MHEALTH干预措施的辍学率很高,但可能存在最小化消耗的领域。降低辍学率将使这些应用在长期以来对疾病管理更有效。审判登记国际潜在用户评论(Prospero)CRD42019128737; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/pospero/display_record.php?id=crd42019128737

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号