首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Subpopulation Differences in the Cardiovascular Efficacy of Long-Acting Glucagon-Like Peptide?1 Receptor Agonists in Type?2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Subpopulation Differences in the Cardiovascular Efficacy of Long-Acting Glucagon-Like Peptide?1 Receptor Agonists in Type?2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:亚血管血管疗效差异的长效胰高血糖素样肽的差异?1型糖尿病类型的受体激动剂:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

IntroductionThe cardiovascular efficacy of glucagon-like peptide?1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in type?2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are well documented; however, the differences in cardiovascular efficacy among subpopulations remain unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the differences in cardiovascular efficacy of long-acting GLP-1RAs among subpopulations of patients with T2DM and to assess the drug safety.MethodsRelevant studies up to March?31, 2020 were searched for in six electronic databases, namely PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Clinical Trials, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (including cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke). Subpopulations were defined using ten selected influential factors, and the differences in cardiovascular efficacy in subpopulations stratified by different influential factors were accessed by synthesizing studies with random-effects models one by one.ResultsA total of six cardiovascular outcome trials of long-acting GLP-1RAs, comprising 49,936 participants, were included. Among stratified subpopulations, no significant differences in the cardiovascular efficacy of long-acting GLP-1RAs were observed across the ten characteristics of subjects (all P for interaction??0.05). Favorable trends were observed in the subpopulation with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to that without ( P =?0.171). With regards to safety, long-acting GLP-1RAs did not significantly increase the risk of retinopathy (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.92–1.29; P =?0.316), but increase the risk of serious gastrointestinal events (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.02–1.83; P =?0.037). Long-acting GLP-1RAs did not significantly increase the risk of serious adverse events (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85–1.00; P =?0.039).ConclusionsOur analysis suggested no subpopulation differences in the cardiovascular efficacy of long-acting GLP-1RAs among stratified subpopulations, and favorable trends were only observed in the subpopulation with established CVD. These findings may have implications for the management of long-acting GLP-1RAs across subpopulations of patients with T2DM.
机译:介绍胰高血糖素样肽的心血管疗效?1型糖尿病(T2DM)的β2糖尿病(GLP-1RAS)的心血管疗效均良好记录;然而,群体之间的心血管疗效差异仍然未知。这种系统审查和荟萃分析旨在探讨长效GLP-1RAS在T2DM患者群体中的心血管疗效差异,并评估药物安全。在六电子中搜索了3月31日的水平研究,2020年数据库,即PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,Embase,临床试验,科学直接和科学网。主要结果是三点主要不良心血管事件(包括心血管死亡率,非致命心肌梗死和非致命中风)。使用十种选定的影响因素定义亚步骤,通过用随机效应模型的研究,通过1逐一的六种心血管结果,通过合成不同影响因素分层的群体中的心血管疗效在分层的差异。总共六个长效GLP-1的六种心血管结果试验包括包括49,936名参与者。在分层群中,在受试者的十个特征中观察到长效GLP-1RAS的心血管疗效没有显着差异(所有P用于相互作用?> 0.05)。与没有(P = 0.171)相比,在成熟的心血管疾病(CVD)中观察到有利趋势(CVD)。关于安全性,长效GLP-1RAS没有显着增加视网膜病变的风险(或1.09; 95%CI 0.92-1.29; p = 0.316),但增加了严重胃肠事件的风险(或1.37; 95% CI 1.02-1.83; p = 0.037)。长效GLP-1RAS没有显着增加严重不良事件的风险(或0.92; 95%CI 0.85-1.00; P = 0.039)。CONCLUSIONSURION分析表明,在长起来的GLP-1RAS的心血管疗效中没有亚贫困差异在具有已建立的CVD的亚贫困中仅观察到分层群体和有利趋势。这些发现可能对患有T2DM患者的群体进行管理的长效GLP-1RAS的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号